Thursday, February 25, 2021

Open the Unemployment Insurance office already

Nobody was ready for the pandemic and errors were inevitable. But most institutions have been able to adjust over the last 12 months.

Hawaii's Unemployment Insurance (UI) office was uniquely unprepared, and it wasn't only because of the increasing demand for their services. It's one thing for an institution to be understaffed during emergency situations. But it's magnified when the institution hasn't updated their computer system in decades.! Their database was based on a 1980's era computer system that wasn't meant for a 21st century world

learn more at https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/05/how-an-antiquated-it-system-failed-thousands-of-hawaiis-unemployed/


Understandably, the UI office was closed to the public when the coronavirus crisis hit our shores.

But over time, they should've been able to figure out how to accommodate the public, especially when dealing with clients who may not have internet access at home! Especially when almost nobody has the time or patience to call an overwhelmed call center!

But the most insulting excuse for not reopening the UI office to the public was the fear of angry clients coming in.


https://www.staradvertiser.com/2021/02/20/hawaii-news/state-makes-big-dent-in-jobless-claim-backlog/


And it’s unlikely that state labor officials will open their offices for in-person visits for people seeking additional help anytime soon, even though Hawaii is vaccinating essential state workers. The department’s director remains concerned that local offices would be overwhelmed by thousands of angry, unemployed residents, imperiling her employees’ safety.



This got me writing a letter to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser which got published in today's edition


https://www.staradvertiser.com/2021/02/25/editorial/letters/letters-ui-offices-must-open-for-in-person-assistance/


The state’s unemployment insurance (UI) office remains closed to the public due to worries about angry UI applicants showing up (“Hawaii makes big dent in jobless claim backlog, but the call center remains overwhelmed,” Star-Advertiser, Feb. 20).

Well, what do officials think retail employees have been dealing with this whole time? They are confronted by angry customers all the time, yet the stores still open. Meanwhile, many unemployed people lack access to computers and are having their mental health affected by calling the UI phone that almost never gets answered.

Those people need in-person services. The UI office had months to plan how to install Plexiglass, implement social distancing procedures and hire security officers, all to assist unemployed residents who need assistance ASAP.

It’s time for the state to stop making excuses and start living in the real world everyone else lives in, and open the UI offices already.

Pablo Wegesend


Right after I emailed that letter, I realized I forgot to mention an important point: Continuing to keep the UI office closed to avoid angry people WILL ONLY CREATE MORE ANGER from the public! 


People want solutions and they are tired of waiting! They are angry that they are out of a job, out of money to survive, and out of hope! 

And even worse, THEY ARE ANGRY that the very people that are supposed to help them are unavailable!

THEY ARE ANGRY that they have to waste hours on the phone trying to call someone who might not answer!

THEY ARE ANGRY because they can't afford computers or smartphones to email their concerns, and THEY ARE ANGRY at this elitist snobbery that expects everyone to have the latest iPhone or iPad,  nevermind that the reason they need help is that they have difficulty affording food and shelter, and therefore not even able to get the latest gadgets!

And most importantly, THEY ARE EVEN MORE ANGRY NOW because UI is running away from the people instead of running to help the people!

And the most important thing to know about anger is that if the problem is not solved, THAT ANGER WILL  GROW AND GROW AND GROW! When that anger grows, it becomes very dangerous!

If the UI office had reopened to the public last November, that anger from the public would have calmed down by now! 

Had the UI office reopened last November (let's say the 2nd of the month, since it was a Monday), yes the first few days would've been rough with the angry clients. But after a few weeks, more people would've had their issues resolved, and therefore less angry people coming in. The amount of angry people will be less than before. Things would've been a little more chill by now (late February 2021) had the UI office reopened months ago!

But because the UI office insists on being closed, the anger among the people will continue to grow, bringing in more rage once the office actually opens! 


====


And get this, almost every other institution adjusted to the new reality. I currently work at a fashion retail store, we had to adjust our ways. We implemented social distancing measures, we implemented outbreak prevention measures (for example, I'm the one who wipes all the high-touch points throughout the store), we implemented curbside pickup, we accommodate delivery workers from DoorDash, we do returns/exchanges in one location, and much much more.

Do we get unreasonable angry customers at times? Definitely. We've seen entitled customers having a meltdown over simple requests for identification, being notified that we ran out of gift boxes, and even requests to follow covid-19 guidelines. But because we have been open for months, most customers are chill because we don't fear dealing with their issues in person, we embrace dealing with their issues in person.  And many times, the customers leave the store happier than they were when they came in. 


One thing that the UI office needs to learn is this: We can't run away from our problems all the time. Time to stop being scared, start being brave, and start working with the people! 

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Did I contradict myself on de-platforming & cancelling

 Earlier this month, I had a blog post about de-platforming people from social media

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2021/02/on-de-platforming-social-media-users.html

one of my quotes from the blog post

As for me personally, I'd rather not advocate de-platforming anyone. I want the voices of others (especially the voices I hate) to be available so that we can keep track of them. 

and

So I say let the bad guys talk on social media. Censoring them isn't going to make them go away! 

And more importantly, the solution to bad uses of speech is to make good use of speech.

Deplatforming is a lazy way to act like your opponents don't exist! It "protects" you from actually working on your talking points! 



But wait a minute, a few months earlier, I advocated that 98.5  fire the Wake-Up Crew for their repulsive humor


https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/11/fire-985-wake-up-crew.html

For too long, the people of Hawaii have been too silent about these Wake Up Crew jerks because they're afraid of being accused of "not being able to take a joke"!


I say that 98.5 should fire the Wake Up Crew!


and

To anyone who responds by saying "free speech" and "cancel culture", if I acted the same way these Wake Up Crew jerks act at any job I ever had, I would've been fired!

"Free speech" only means you can't be jailed for expressing your opinions. "Free speech" doesn't mean you're entitled to a job! 


So why the mixed messages from me?  


Because I want repulsive scum like the Wake Up Crew to lose their lucrative corporate sponsorships and turn them into broke losers whose social media following is too small to be major influences but still have the space to self-destruct in public view.  I want them to be broke but still be spied upon!


With their radio show, Wake Up Crew had the reach to be heard when people walk into gas stations playing their show in the background. Just imagine stopping by to refill your gas tank or to even buy some snacks and hearing that garbage in the background. You just went to get out of there ASAP!   But off the radio, their voices are pushed into the fringe, gas stations are playing something else in the background. 

I'm sure the same situation gets played millions of times throughout the continental USA where right-wing radio is more popular, with people wanting to get the hell out of the gas stations that might be playing this pro-Trump nonsense in the background. 


And also this:  with having their radio show, the Wake Up Crew felt emboldened to spew their repulsive jokes about the homeless, disabled and ethnic groups. But without their radio show, they can't get paid for such garbage. They can talk all the crap on Facebook/Twitter/Instagram but it brings in no money. So now they have come to the crossroads: they can continue to make their jokes to a dwindling audience or they can wise up, grow up and be more cognizant of what they say on social media.  With their being fired from the radio show, they're more careful on social media without being de-platformed there! 


So yeah, I'll fire the bigots from radio, TV & other profitable venues, but let them be spied on social media where they'll just be another sad, broke chumps with no real influence beyond their inner circle! 

Rush Limbaugh

 The master of conservative talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, died last week at the age of 70!

photo by Gage Skidmore
Rush Limbaugh

While he wasn't the first in the game, he elevated the political talk radio format into the mainstream and spawned many imitators! 

Limbaugh became a national household name in the late 80s going into the 90s.   This was an era when the center-left had a near-monopoly of the media, and Fox News was not yet in existence. In fact, Roger Ailes was a producer of Limbaugh's short-lived TV show before starting Fox News under Rupert Murdoch in 1996. And don't forget, the Internet was in its infancy at the time and was a few years away from being mainstream. 

Limbaugh was also a best-selling author with his books "The Way Things Ought to Be" and "See I Told You So". 

While politics is a serious topic, Limbaugh was talented in making political discussions entertaining even if you didn't agree with him. 

He did expose the hypocrisies of the Democrats and liberal activists. However, he was always a kiss-ass to the Republican Party, and never contradicted the main leaders of the party even when they flip-flopped in their positions. 

The Left did claim that Limbaugh was a white supremacist, a misogynist, and a homophobe.

I don't believe Limbaugh was a white supremacist, though he could be tone-deaf at times. There's a difference between being a hardcore bigot vs being occasionally tone-deaf. I'll never encourage either, but Limbaugh was more in the tone-deaf category. In fact, as I mentioned in previous posts, Hawaii's former 98.5 Wake Up Crew was way more vulgar and bigoted than Limbaugh

(blog posts on 98.5 Wake Up Crew)

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2017/05/wake-up-with-brown-privilege.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/11/fire-985-wake-up-crew.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/12/bullies-get-dunked-on.html


In fact, Walter Williams was a guest host, and James Golden (aka Bo Snerdly) was a producer on his show. Both were African-Americans. 

link to Bo Snerdly's interview after Limbaugh's death https://news.yahoo.com/rush-limbaugh-incredibly-great-human-150644012.html


Some of the alleged racist quotes attributed to Limbaugh were found to be unsubstantiated accorded to Snopes

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rush-limbaugh-racist-quotes/


Last year, Limbaugh did call Charlamagne Tha God's Breakfast Club (a talk show that is popular among hip-hop audiences) and expressed his disgust towards the cops who killed George Floyd, but he also disagreed with the concept of "white privilege".  While he did convince that he wasn't a hardcore bigot, it still comes across as  tone-deaf. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y1vGD7bNEg


I did remember listening to Limbaugh's show when he made fun of the name of a Chinese pilot who crashed into a US spy-plane in the early 2000's. I remember being in the same room with a friend of Asian ancestry when we heard it, and we definitely cringed at that joke! 


Limbaugh was also tone-deaf on gender issues.  He mocked a liberal activist for being a "slut" for lobbying the government to subsidize birth control and mocked the appearance of Democrat women.  

Some of Limbaugh's statements did go BEYOND mere tone-deafness and were truly deplorable & repulsive.

For example, in the early 90s, he had a segment mocking gay men who were dying of AIDS. Limbaugh later apologized.

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-rush-limbaugh-mock-aids-death-radio-show-1570282


He also mocked Micheal J Fox's symptoms of Parkinson's Disease after he made an ad supporting Democrat candidates. 

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/rush-limbaugh-death-michael-j-fox/


He also mocked Kurt Cobain after his suicide in 1994. However, later in life, just like Cobain,  Limbaugh became addicted to drugs he started taking to ease his physical pains.  Be careful what you make fun of, it might soon be you. 

For these statements, many will never forgive Rush Limbaugh, and many celebrated his death on social media.

Being that I once listened to his show in the early 2000s and I did read his books, I knew there was a Rush Limbaugh beyond these cringe-worthy statements. I knew he had valuable insights on politics, economics & more.

However, as a public figure, you have to understand that once you make cringe-worthy statements, you lose the trust of millions, regardless of whatever good things you may have said. You claim "it's not fair" but so what? You can only push people around so much before they say "I'm done with you". 


I say the new generation of radio/TV/podcast hosts can learn from Limbaugh's comedic talents without abusing such talents.