Wednesday, July 14, 2021

Libertarians & Maturity in 2021

I got interested in the libertarian philosophy in my early 20's (that would be in the early 2000's) because it offered an alternative to the right-wing/left-wing, Democrat/Republican binaries, and it emphasizes a less intrusive government. 

As with any movement, there's a mix of sane people with great ideas & insane people who repulse people away. 

I was fascinated by the ideas expressed by Harry Browne (1996 & 2000 presidential candidate), wasn't impressed by Micheal Badnarik (2004) and was totally repulsed by Bob Barr (2008). 

 
Then in 2012, I wrote a classic blog post titled "Libertarian Movement gaining maturity" back when Gary Johnson was running as the Libertarian Party candidate for president.

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2012/11/libertarian-movement-gaining-maturity.html

Gary Johnson was a former governor of New Mexico. He had a real track record when it came to dealing with emergencies and enacting policies with a legislature that don't always agree with him.

When you're a governor (or mayor or president), you have to pick your battles wisely. On some issues, you have to go hard. On other issues, it is best to compromise and take the "half a loaf". 

Gary Johnson was willing to take "half a loaf" if it meant some of his ideas get implemented.

The problem with too many libertarians is that they view every compromise as a betrayal.  They view 80% agreement as "not good enough".

And in the case of the 2004 presidential candidate Michael Badnarik, once he stated that we shouldn't need government-issued driver's licenses, that became all the press wanted to focus on.  That is an example of Badnarik not picking his battles wisely.

Not only do you want to pick your battles wisely, you want to chose your allies wisely. 


Some libertarians try to make alliance with the progressives due to the common interest on criminal justice reform & a less militarized foreign policy. They are known as the "cool libertarians"


However, some libertarians try to make alliance with the Alt-Right due to the shared suspicion towards political correctness & socialism. They are known as the "paleo-libertarians"

The problem with the paleo-libertarians is that they don't understand the serious harm of racism, misogyny, xenophobia or homophobia. They think that too much focus on that is "political correctness".  

Some libertarians may want a big tent, but there's no tent big enough to hold white supremacists &  people of non-European ancestries together. There's no tent big enough to hold homophobes and gender non-conforming people together. 

 But yet, we have the paleo-libertarians, who want to make common cause with the Alt-Right in the name of "fighting political correctness and socialism".

And now we have the Mises Caucus, an organization of paleo-libertarians who are attempting to take over the Libertarian Party.  They have already taken over the state party for New Hampshire. While New Hampshire is a small state out of 50 states, what happens there doesn't always stay there. 

 https://reason.com/2021/06/23/inside-the-battle-over-the-soul-of-the-libertarian-party/

 A "toxic culture has recently been harnessed in the service of a grouping with a declared goal of taking over the party and making it as repulsive as possible to everyone except themselves," Bishop-Henchman wrote in his resignation letter, referring to the party's ascendant Mises Caucus, which for the past few years has been advertising its intentions to launch a "takeover" of the L.P. to realign it more with the policy and messaging associated with Ron Paul and the Ludwig von Mises Institute. "I will not chair a party that knowingly and has now affirmatively chosen to stay affiliated with the toxic garbage that was being spewed by the New Hampshire party and similar bad actors in other states, the violent threats emanating from these people, and the deliberate destruction of the party's ability to appeal to voters and win elections."


One of those people in the Mises Caucus is Jeremy Kauffman, a totally repulsive troll who said things like this

(from https://twitter.com/jeremykauffman/status/1368700538825637893)

if 1,000 transpeople were murdered every year but there were no taxes, we'd live in a substantially more moral world for reference about 40 people transgender people are murdered in the US per year 


Now imagine a young gender nonconforming person reading that tweet. Imagine that same person still learning which political philosophies are the best one. Imagine the same person learning that Jeremy Kauffman claims to be a "libertarian".  Do you think the same person would ever want to ever be aligned with libertarianism if that is the first encounter with a so-called libertarian?  HELL NO! 

The Libertarian Party has been supporting same-sex marriage since the 1970s, long before the Democrats joined the bandwagon.

But someone who is a college freshman may not know that.  The college freshman whose first encounter with "libertarianism" is the Jeremy Kauffman tweet isn't going to pursue further interest in libertarianism.  Why be interested in joining a movement with someone who thinks you being dead is OK as long as everyone else pays no tax?

 

But there's even more from Jeremy Kauffman

Among the controversial LPNH tweets attributed to Kauffman was a call to "legalize child labor" because "children will learn more on a job site than in public school," another to keep Gitmo open "so that Anthony Fauci and every governor that locked their state down can be sent there, never again to be allowed inside of the United States," and still another to "Repeal the Civil Rights Act."


Really? This is the hill that paleo-libertarians want to die on? Really? 


This is an extreme lack of maturity!

This isn't a serious attempt to teach people the values of liberty!

This is just "Hey Look at Me Everybody, I'm Being Politically Incorrect".

But that is the main driver for Jeremy Kauffman and the Mises Caucus.

And the sad thing is that this is all a major step backward from when Gary Johnson was running for president in 2012 & 2016. Johnson attracted record-breaking support for a Libertarian candidate. He attracted support from former conservatives disgusted by Donald Trump, as well as former progressives becoming skeptical of socialism. Despite his sometimes goofy moments, Johnson showed way more maturity than Donald Trump.

But sadly, the Mises Caucus want the Libertarian Party to be more like Donald Trump, nevermind that the appeal of Gary Johnson was to say "F*** Donald Trump".

The drama of Jeremy Kauffman and his goons from the Mises Caucus has caused an exodus of Gary Johnson supporters away from the Libertarian Party. In other words, an exodus of supporters who helped the Libertarian Party break records in getting votes.

Alexander DiBenedetto, who ran the Pragmatist Caucus until its post–New Hampshire dissolution, warned in a phone interview Sunday that a Mises takeover would likely mean "the majority of the people from the Gary Johnson days leaving the party." (Those campaigns got the party its highest ever national vote totals and percentages.) The L.P. should spend less time and energy perfecting the most polarizing tweet to attract the most hate-retweets, DiBenedetto said, and more time organizing such initiatives as the door-knocking Frontier Project, which actually won a state legislative seat for Libertarian Marshall Burt in Wyoming last year. If a Mises Caucus–style candidate wins the party's presidential nomination in 2024, he said, state parties unhappy with that approach might disaffiliate from the national party.

Francis Wendt, the Region 1 LNC member who resigned June 19, wrote in his farewell letter, "I will give the [Mises Caucus] credit, they have a very active base….However, activists are only part of the equation. You also need candidates, leaders, staff, and donors. Twitter trolls don't do that. Email blasts don't do that. Regurgitated messages from people that only show up for a day (convention) don't do that. Knocking doors does that. Writing checks does that. Making calls does that. Sitting up till 3 AM pouring over research does that."

In his resignation letter, Bishop-Henchman sounded a warning of his own. "Toxic people exhaust or drive out good people," he said. "Our mechanisms for removing such individuals and addressing such bad behavior are designed to be effectively impossible, and culturally, too many people who should know better passively tolerate it rather than confront it. It turns off donors, repulses allies, and makes team projects unviable."

 

-------

And the thing is that even though I'm not a full-on libertarian (I believe in having a safety net, and I do believe in some covid-era restrictions), I value much from the cool libertarians, from their emphasis 

  • on legalizing a lot of things
  •  on entrepreneurship
  •  on a less militaristic foreign policy
  • de-escalating the police 
  • justice for gender nonconforming people
  • treating people as individuals rather than members of groups
  • a lenient immigration policy
 

 But the paleo-libertarians like Jeremy Kauffman and the rest of the Mises Caucus are lowlife scum! I want nothing to do with them!


Monday, July 12, 2021

Haunani-Kay Trask

 Earlier this month,  Haunani-Kay Trask, a Hawaiian sovereignty activist and a Hawaiian Studies professor, has died at the age of 71.

Her passionate speeches have inspired many Native Hawaiians and other indigenous people to stand up for the culture and against imperialism.

Her most famous quote, spoken at the 100th anniversary of the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, stated "We Are Not Americans, We are Hawaiians", the most legendary statement of defiance against American imperialism in Hawaii.

Since her death, many of the younger generation of Hawaiian activists noted her as an inspiration.

But what if Trask could've been more effective?

The younger generation of activists were too young to remember when Trask was speaking to the public in real time and she was in the front page of the papers and the top story in TV news.

So they don't realize that the real reason Trask was controversial was

  • NOT because she said "We are Not Americans"
  • NOT because she wanted Hawaii to be independent from the US

We had plenty of Hawaiian sovereignty activists like Bumpy Kanahele and Keanu Sai who didn't even get even nearly the same level of pushback that Trask got.

The pushback is because Trask openly expressed hostility towards people of non-Hawaiian ancestries, and loudly accused anyone who didn't kiss her ass of being "anti-Hawaiian". 

I noted this back in a blog post from 2018.


The problem with the Hawaiian independence movement is that too much attention has been given to those who vent recklessly. The prime example is Haunani-Kay Trask, a Hawaiian Studies instructor who is notorious for her anti-haole rants and calling non-natives "uninvited guests".

Does anyone really think you can gain support from non-natives by calling them "uninvited guests" and saying "Hawaii can benefit from one less haole"?

 Remember, about 75% of Hawaii's population are of non-native ancestry! That's the majority!  Native Hawaiians are outnumbered by European-Americans, Japanese and Filipinos.

That means in order to gain support for Hawaiian independence, you have to convince enough Europeans, Japanese, Filipinos, and other non-natives to support the cause!  

I noted that back in 2000 when I was an opinions writer at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa's student newspaper Ka Leo O Hawaii (usually referred to its shortened name  Ka Leo).  

The article I wrote was an Open-Letter to Haunani-Kay Trask in response to her book "From a Native Daughter".

While the Ka Leo O Hawaii's website doesn't currently archive anything from the year 2000 or before


(note: on the blog post, I put a link to a geocities site that reposted my open letter, but the site is no longer active) 


However, here is a scanned copy of the article as printed in the Ka Leo on 09/14/2000


(note: you may want to click on the scanned images to read it better. I apologize if it's still hard to read.  If you want my retype the editorial in a format that is easier to read, let me know, but it will take time before I send it to you)



 
 
note: for the Ka Leo article title & sub-heading, the editors are in charge of that. But I did write the content of the article. 
 




and 

Trask herself didn't respond (this was around the same time Trask had a public dispute with then-governor Ben Cayetano, a Filipino descendant who said he was "Hawaiian at heart". Trask responded by holding a  sign saying "f*** Ben").

However, her cronies posted angry letters to Ka Leo, claiming I "didn't know Hawaii history" and calling me "racist" (ironically for questioning Trask's racism).  Luckily, I wasn't physically confronted by anyone. (also lucky that my photo didn't appear in the Ka Leo. Also lucky that this was before the age of social media, where people can find out what I look like.).

The following year, Trask got controversy again when she commented that the 9/11 attacks were "chicken coming home to roost" which was interpreted as "Americans got what they deserved".


Since then, Trask has been out of the public spotlight! Either she decided her rants were poison for the movement, or the local media stopped giving her attention.


(note: I didn't know at the time that Trask was suffering from Alzheimer's  in the last years of her life. That surely has more to do with why she wasn't in the public eye in the last decade of her life) 


As for the article itself, if I was to rewrite it now, I most likely would tone down the aggression of the questioning a bit. In others, a little more self-tone-policing. But I still stand by most of what I wrote. 


But there was one interesting point made in one of the criticisms about that article. It was in reference about my mentions of the Nene goose in the editorial. This from Lance Collins, who later became my editor at Ka Leo 

https://www.manoanow.org/trask-media-clash-again/article_c7a47924-6eff-5bd9-a79a-6c079fd7e168.html


Then, he argued that the claims for social justice of the Kanaka Maoli are the same as claims made by animals. Equating human beings with animals is a very classic example of racism in language


It was never my intention to "equate human beings to animals", but Collins is correct that I should never had used the example of the Nene Goose (and other indigenous species) in that article. 


About a year after Collins' critique, he did become the editor of the opinion section, but we never had a discussion of his critique of my editorial.  Maybe both of us were trying to avoid an awkward moment. We did have a good working relations, though I did object to how one of my editorials got titled. 


However, another person did respond to Collin's article. It was Grant Crowell, a former comic artist at Ka Leo. He was there before I was at UH, but I did meet him in person years later. We are still connected on social media.  Here's what he wrote about his encounter with Trask


https://www.manoanow.org/letters-to-the-editor-11-01-01/article_4ac6d2c0-8887-5567-86f9-13ea720cac3c.html


Lance is right to say that there were no "witch-hunts" of Trask then, but that is because it was Trask herself who was leading the witch-hunt. Several Ka Leo editors and I were at a Board of Publications meeting (the organization that oversees the Ka Leo newspaper) back in 1994, when Trask brought her tiny mob demanding my firing from Ka Leo for the cartoon I drew.

She screamed to the Board that I was "vermin," that I was responsible for bomb threats in her building, and that I should suffer the same fate as an unknown cartoonist who was executed and dismembered during the Nuremburg Trials.

Infuriated that my editor-in-chief, a Filipino woman, defended me, Trask called her to her face a "fucking stupid bitch!" What Lance would call "refusing to engage in colonial morality" — for a professor to yell the word "fuck" over and over again at another — others would call it running out of intelligent things to say (and if Trask and Lance really believed that line, then why don't they use another term besides the Western word, "fuck?").

and also this


Lance and Trask say "demand accountability." Yet they accept no accountability for their attacks on others. This is evident in how they single out people for their race (including other Hawaiians, who they label "Uncle Toms") and then hide behind the ideas of "an attack on me is an attack on all Hawaiians!," or the much-maligned "I can't be a racist because I'm not in power!"

Shibai! Saying one ethnic group has less perceived power than another doesn't mean they have no power at all, and it certainly doesn't mean that individuals such as Trask don't carry a wealth of power themselves.

How silly would it be to say that former Hawaiian governor John Waihee had no power, even when being governor? How incredulous would it be to say that Trask had no power when she was director of the Hawaiian Studies department, being able to hire and fire whomever she pleased? And how despicable to say somebody has no power while they're punching you in the face?


========

Now back to me! 

 before anyone start accusing me of "settler colonialism" (I'm not a settler, I'm a descendant of settlers), let me post a few facts about myself

  • I may not be of Native Hawaiian ancestry, but some members of my extended family are
  • I always had friendly relations with Native Hawaiian peers in school and in work
  • I was once in support of Hawaii being part of the US but that has changed as noted in   

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2018/05/personal-evolution-on-my-thoughts-on-us.html

  • I am now in support of Hawaii being an Independent Nation as noted in

  https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2019/08/6-decades-of-statehood.html
https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2016/12/my-letter-to-newspaper-hawaii.html
https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2016/11/its-time-for-hawaii-to-declare.html


  • I strongly supporting renaming my high school alma mater from its current name "McKinley High School" to its former name "Honolulu High School"

 https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2018/05/put-tiger-statue-on-oval.html

  • I have lost MULTIPLE friendships from my fellow alumni over my support of the name change of my high school

But also know this, I don't need to be Native Hawaiian to express disagreement with Haunani-Kay Trask!

Just like it doesn't automatically make you anti-Latino to express disagreement with me, even on Latino-related issues. 


I want the Native Hawaiians to regain the sense of nationhood that they lost in 1898.

But I also know that the Hawaiian monarchy welcomed immigrants from around the world, and attempted alliances with other island nations of Polynesia, Melanesia & Micronesia. 

I want an Independent Hawaii that is of respecting of diversity (Even among non-native residents) just like it was when the Hawaiian monarchy was in power.