The head librarian there was Natalie Lum (aka Miss Lum), a person with really horrible people skills and a negative attitude!
I wrote a blog post and 2 videos about her repulsive ways. They focus on her unclear instructions, her rudeness, and her negative attitude towards Micronesians.
I was in the middle of writing my 2nd blog post when the police came by the serve a restraining order from Miss Lum.
The TRO petition was full of exaggerations about my imperfections. She acted as if she was a "damsel in distress", nevermind that her actual reputation on campus was one of "The Enforcer" who relishes the confrontation with students no matter how large they are, or even how large their clique is. She yells in a low voice "where's your IDs?" when 2 classes (circa 25 students each) enter the library. When teachers lose control of their students in the library, Miss Lum jumps into the fray and installs fear into them. And even off-campus, she has done side gigs as security at public events.
Does that sound like a "damsel in distress" to you?
I didn't make any threats towards her. Her physical safety was NEVER in danger! She was just sour grapes that someone had the nerve to publicly disagree with Her Majesty!
That was proven come court time when her lawyer said to my lawyer that she'll withdraw her TRO if I took down my social media posts.
If my physical safety was in actual danger, I would actually beg the judge for the maximum restrictions possible on the opposing person!
But Miss Lum was in no actual danger, therefore, she didn't beg for the maximum restriction possible, she just begged me to take down social media posts.
I asked my attorney if Miss Lum was willing to admit her negative comments about Micronesians. My attorney said her attorney said her comments were "taken out of context". In other words, she actually made those comments and she's sour grapes about being exposed.
I took down the posts for a while.
But you know what. I'm reposting the info at
Document: Note to administration on Natalie Lum's negative comments about Micronesians (09/04/2019)
Document: "I'm done with Miss Lum: the repulsive head librarian at Kalākaua Middle School (05/20/2020)
Document: unpublished post on Miss Lum (06/03/2020) - I was literally typing this when HPD came by and notified me about Natalie Lum's TRO petition
Document: Pablo's response to Natalie Lum's TRO petition
https://ea0ca297-891e-49d1-bbc9-39760ddd3f6b.filesusr.com/ugd/c8d67a_d082eb26129d41599e231ba39995895c.pdf
and you know what else?
There is NOTHING in what I posted that expresses any violent feelings towards Miss Lum!
Yes, I know these days some people consider disagreement "violence".
But it's not violence.
It's just disagreement.
and you know what else?
There is NOTHING in what I posted that expresses any violent feelings towards Miss Lum!
Yes, I know these days some people consider disagreement "violence".
But it's not violence.
It's just disagreement.
Miss Lum also considers my response to her "harassment", "stalking" and "cyberbullying".
No, the only thing I did to make Miss Lum uncomfortable is to express disagreement with her.
Miss Lum can continue to be sour grapes about this!
But there's anything that needs to be restrained, it should be Miss Lum who should practice self-restraint from retaliating against me for exposing the truth about her.
Miss Lum apologizes for nothing. It's time for her to prove me wrong! It's time for Miss Lum to apologize.
If there's no additional response from Miss Lum, then this would be my last statement.
Miss Lum can continue to be sour grapes about this!
But there's anything that needs to be restrained, it should be Miss Lum who should practice self-restraint from retaliating against me for exposing the truth about her.
Miss Lum apologizes for nothing. It's time for her to prove me wrong! It's time for Miss Lum to apologize.
If there's no additional response from Miss Lum, then this would be my last statement.
===
PS: If Miss Lum wants an external entity to solve this dispute, she should contact a private mediation service (which I'm willing to meet with) to handle this situation instead of wasting the court's time & resources. The courts should be for real victims of abuse, not so-called "victims" of disagreement.
PS #2: bonus pics
