Saturday, July 11, 2015

Trump, Coulter, immigration & crime

Donald Trump is an attention-getter, and he lived up to that when he officially launched his presidential campaign.

He accused  the Mexican government of purposely sending illegal immigrants to the US with this quote

They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


Anyone who said anything to the effect of "white people bring diseases, police brutality, apartheid and oh yeah, I guess some are good people" would be loudly criticized by Fox News and talk radio hosts for at least 2 weeks!


And this stuff about "Mexicans bring crime" is a bunch of exaggerations anyways.

From Steve Chapman
http://townhall.com/columnists/stevechapman/2015/07/05/trump-and-the-myth-of-immigrant-crime-n2020695/page/full
Trump had other articles, including a couple reporting deadly crimes committed by people who have come here without permission. But anecdotes can be misleading. Out of any group of people -- Episcopalians, West Virginians, tennis fans, legal immigrants from Canada -- you can find some criminals. That doesn't mean the bad guys are representative of the whole.
The outrages cited by Trump are outside the norm, to say the least. U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, pointed out last year, "The murder rate is actually higher in Washington, D.C., where I work, than in my hometown of Laredo, Texas, or other cities on the border like McAllen."
In 2011, El Paso, Texas, had the lowest crime rate ranking of any city with 500,000 or more residents. That is despite being just across the Rio Grande from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico -- which in 2011 had the second highest murder rate of any city on Earth.
The same pattern shows up away from the border as well. In his extensive research on Chicago -- a city Trump cited for its violent crime -- Harvard sociologist Robert Sampson has found "a significantly lower rate of violence among Mexican-Americans compared to blacks and whites."


From Mona Charen
http://townhall.com/columnists/monacharen/2015/07/10/the-democrats-trump-card-n2023530/page/full

Trump has achieved his objective -- making himself the center of attention -- but he has subtracted from our sum total of knowledge about the immigration issue. According to an analysis of Census Bureau data by the Immigration Policy Center, only 1.6 percent of immigrant males between the ages of 18-39 are incarcerated, compared with 3.3 percent of the native-born. There are terrible stories of immigrants committing crimes, and it's certainly fair to demand that criminal aliens be deported with dispatch. Sanctuary cities are a disgrace. But just as Dylann Roof doesn't represent white people, Mexican rapists don't represent anyone other than themselves.
Oddly, the entire brouhaha over immigration may be misplaced. If demographers are correct, the great wave of immigration from Latin America is over. As Jonathan V. Last noted in the Los Angeles Times, birthrates are plunging throughout our hemisphere. Between 1970 and 2005, Mexico was the source for roughly two-thirds of the million or so immigrants who entered the United States yearly. When this huge migration began, Mexico's birthrate was 6.72 children per woman. It has since fallen to 2.1, and it continues to decline. Last writes: "Countries with fertility rates below the replacement level tend to attract immigrants, not send them." And voila, since 2005, net migration from Mexico has been zero.
The Census Bureau reports that starting in 2013, the country that sent the most immigrants to the U.S. was China, with 147,000, followed by India, with 129,000, and Mexico, with 125,000 (an equal number of Mexicans living here went home). 


Of course, you can talk all the facts you want, some people are so emotionally invested in a narrative that they automatically dismiss facts that don't support their emotional narrative.


One of those people is Ann Coulter, another anti-immigration fanatic! When confronted by the facts, she just uses evasive techniques like she did when debating Geraldo Rivera on Fox News.

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/10/immigration_cage_match_geraldo_rivera_and_ann_coulter_throw_down_on_hannity/


Coulter said the following
“We are talking about a group of people who have no right to be here,” she said, adding “whether legal or illegal.” She didn’t clarify as to why legal immigrants have no right to be in America legally
Coulter is so stupid to even imply LEGAL immigrant "have no right to be here" because by law, they do!  That's the point of being a legal immigrant!

It gets crazier

“Is the filibuster over?” Rivera asked. “Let me respond!” And respond he did, noting that rates of violent crimes in the two cities with the highest population of undocumented immigrants — New York and Los Angeles — are at historic lows.
“That means nothing!” Coulter interjected. “That’s not because of immigration!”
“If undocumented immigrants were more prone to commit crimes,” Rivera continued, “why would these cities be experiencing such relative freedom from violent crime. Compare that to Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit, and other post-industrial cities, where there is a spike in terrible crime, where you should be concerned with violence, instead of singling out this population and ginning up this false fear.”

and how does Coulter respond  to these facts?

“Look, you’re talking about a correlation, not a causation. You’re not that stupid, Geraldo!” 


OH, that is what the pro-immigration crowd has been saying this whole time! 

Pro-immigration folks ALMOST ALWAYS MAKE THE POINT THAT  "you’re talking about a correlation, not a causation" when it comes to immigration and crime rates

But when pro-immigration folks say "you’re talking about a correlation, not a causation"............what does Ann Coulter do?

Coulter responds by calling pro-immigration folks of being "politically correct pansies"

But now Ann Coulter wants to say "you’re talking about a correlation, not a causation" when confronted by the facts?

------


Coulter claims to be concerned about those raped by illegal immigrant rapists?

But what about the majority of rape victims who are ..........raped by someone of their own race!

Coulter's response of "la la la, I can't hear you"


http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ann-coulter-women-who-say-theyve-been-raped-are-typically-just-girls-trying-get-attention



Ann Coulter appeared on “The Lars Larson Show” last week to discuss the discrepancies in Rolling Stone’s article on an alleged gang rape at the University of Virginia, which Coulter called a “shocking fraud” that proves that “there is no rape crisis” on college campuses.
Coulter also suggested that rapes only occur in physically violent circumstances, like “being hit on the head with a brick,” and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to get attention.

So in other words, if you're European-American college student who has been drugged and raped by Euopean-American frat boys, Ann Coulter doesn't care about you!

But if you're the isolated case of a  European-American woman raped by some Mexican immigrant, Ann Coulter will exploit your case to no end in sight! 


 If that's not racism, then the word "racism" has no meaning!

Friday, July 10, 2015

Professional Victim Professor (part 3)


Note: this blog post is a continuation of these previous blog posts

http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2015/04/problems-at-hsl.html
http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2015/05/professional-victim-professor.html
http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2015/06/professional-victim-professor-part-2.html



In the previous blog posts, I expose why Dr Noriko Asato is a corrupt and incompetent internship coordinator and what a bullstuff artist she is when she claims to feel threatened.


But how in the hell did Noriko Asato get hired in the first place?

Let's be blunt: she's a crony hire. Her husband was the LIS Program Chair for a few years. Even if he wasnt on the committee that made the final decision to hire her, to say his marriage nothing to do with it is extraordinarily naive!

Dr Noriko Asato only got her LIS degree in 2011.  This is only 4 years later!  You mean to tell me she was so impressive in such short time as a librarian that she outshined those with decades of experience in the field? Spare me the naivete!


Was she selected for her teaching passion? What teaching passion? Her elective classes are always online, and for her LIS 610 ... it was advertised as an in-person class, but half the sessions are "online sessions" (you just have to hear the way she say those 2 words), which just goes to show she views teaching as just another nuisance that comes with the job!

She was placed in charge of the Info Profession class and was  the internship as if she had proper
mentoring skills and as if she could handle difficult situations! Ha! She gets intimidated anytime I express disagreement with her! That show she wouldn't last an hour outside the Ivory Tower!


If you're going to say "you can vent to me"  (Dr Noriko Asato actually said that to me)   then you better be ready for it!  You can't say "you can vent to me" and act all victimized 
when it happens!

Anyone who works outside of the Ivory Tower can understand that, especially since in jobs like retail or sub teacher people WILL vent to you to your face, sometimes with a loud voice and with profanities!

Yet when Dr Noriko Asato said "you can vent to me" and I took her words literally  I sent her emails (see "Professional Victim Professor") and I vented without profanities! Yet Noriko Asato (who spent decades in an Ivory Tower instead of the Real World) claims to
"feel afraid" and "threatened" by such mildly expressed disagreement in the emails! That is so pathetic! Try being like that when dealing with an irate customer at Macys or an irate student at school. That Dr Noriko Asato has no real world experience with such situations shows that is severely inadequate to be internship coordinator or teaching classes about work environment!


Dr Noriko Asato should learn the real humility to admit she's wrong (like any Macys employee has to
if he/she made a mistake) or grow a damn spine when dealing with resistance! If you ever worked as a sub teacher, you cannot show the type of excessive sissyness that Dr Noriko Asato showed when she says "I feel threatened".

 No sub teacher would even dare show such weakness even when faced with a large student with a bad attitude! That just shows Dr Noriko Asato is the wrong person for the job!

------------

You see, Dr Noriko Asato NEVER questions corrupt officials. Dr Noriko Asato ALWAYS advise people to NEVER protest poor treatment by higher officials. That right there tells me that Dr Noriko Asato is the devil's disciple!

What would Dr Noriko Asato do if she was living in the Nazi era and they were coming after her Jewish husband? She would either snitch on him, or advise him to give in!



You think I'm exaggerating? Check how she responded when I protesting against Tisha Aragaki treated me at HSL!






Cease any private or public complaints with the HSPLS?   SCREW YOU! 

Hey Noriko Asato, if you didnt think I would post for the world to see, then you are an extremely stupid person whose advanced degrees are all for nothing!


When i expressed objections that that notice, Dr Noriko Asato again tried to convince me not to be angry, which real life professionals (instead of crony hires like  Noriko Asato) would NEVER advise anyone to do!! 

(by the way,  I never signed that paper at all! Take that Noriko Asato!  She got disciplined for even asking me to sign that paper! HA HA HA! Take that you scum!  ) 

But more to my point!

It  is NOT hard to imagine Dr Noriko Asato to treat people like MLK, Susan B Anthony or Nelson Mandela the same way!  IT takes a special type of person to cheer them on when the heat is on! 

It also takes a special type of scumbag to discourage people from standing up for themselves! Dr Noriko Asato is that special type of scumbag!



Dr Noriko Asato is a severe disgrace to humanity!  

--------------------------------


The following are annotations of a screenshot of My Photo (for which I own ALL copyrights to) from the LIS 610 class photo. The original photo (without annotations) can be found on my facebook page.



Hi, i'm Dr Noriko Asato, I have no honor and no dignity! I teach about ethics, but I am very unethical!


Noriko Asato will not only lie, but will pressure you into approving her lies!


She's got advanced degrees, but TOO STUPID TO REALIZE  - the severe psychological harm she causes by telling interns to "not be angry" and to "withdraw complaints" - it would've been better to have a ho'oponopono session between intern & supervisor than to tell the intern to suffer in silence - her unethical & psychologically dangerous behavior will get exposed worldwide on the internet


Noriko Asaot doesn't believe in using the Ho'oponopono process to solve problems


Noriko Asato, a coordinator that refuses to mediate conflicts

Noriko Asato discourages people from having courage


will accuse you of making her "feel afraid" if you have the nerve to (gasp) express disagreement with her

she actually thinks telling an ANGRY person to "dont have anger" will actually work! Most professionals don't agree!



tells interns it's not good to have anger, yet she has easily hurt feelings whenever you disagree with her. Dr Noriko Asato is an extreme hypcorite. Her stupdity is so enormous that it makes Mount Everest look like a pebble! She got advanced degrees but no logic, no consistency and no common sense!



believes in the philosophy of "no snitching, no tattling, suffer in silence"

Noriko Asato actually tells people they shouldn't stand up for themselves

Noriko Asato believes people should suffer in silence









Yeah, Dr Noriko Asato, is this how you want to be known? This is what happens to corrupt officials who say stupid things to me! You should have seen this coming!

------

PS#1:  There is absolutely NOTHING on here that threatens any physical harm to anyone or anything!

Any claims that this blog post is "threatening" or "intimidating" will be challenged!


This blog is my use of Intellectual Freedom to protest corruption at HSL, LIS and UH-Manoa.  



Any attempt by anyone in the LIS Program or any UH-Manoa official to discipline me  in any form is a violation of my Intellectual Freedom and my freedom to express grievances on an academic siutation! 

 Any attempt by anyone in the LIS Program or any UH-Manoa official to discipline me  in any form over this blog will be challenged in multiple ways!



PS# 2 : IF any LIS or UH-Manoa official wants to have a conversation about this will have to consent being recorded by my mobile device. Whether the recordings goes on YouTube or any other online forum will be determined by myself by whatever reason I choose!  

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

Gender & Fights

Pretend you're an average sized man! Imagine you're at the bar  trying to order a beverage. Now imagine all of a sudden, someone the size of Suge Knight bumped against you, trying to make room for himself so he too could order a beverage?

Would you even try to throw a punch at him?

What would happen if you did?

Probably get knocked out, right?


Yet, in Tallahassee, Florida,  a woman at the bar, got so upset when Florida State QB DeAndre Johnson accidentally bumped against her,  that she started yelling and made a fist. Johnson tried to restrain her like a gentleman would! But the woman responded by punching Johnson.  ONLY AFTER that did Johnson punched her in the face!

You can watch it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGGdlL5U61U



In other words, De'Andre Johnson defended himself against an aggressor!


But because Florida State University (FSU) didn't investigate rape allegations against Jameis Winson (aka Rapist Winston) until months after allegations surface,  FSU is now in over-compensation mode!

Jameis Winston's case should've been subjected to aggressive investigations. Based on the allegations and testimony, Rapist Winston should've been expelled!
You learn more about Rapist Winston not receiving the proper investigation at http://www.thenation.com/blog/193985/reality-their-own-jameis-winston-rape-and-seminole-fandom-florida-state


But De'Andre Johnson?  He got expelled for .................defending himself!  Screw That!

As for this cliche about  "you shouldn't hit a girl?" 


De'Andre Johnson was not hitting a girlfriend for dancing with another guy

De'Andre Johnson was not hitting a girlfriend for texting another guy

De'Andre Johnson was not hitting his wife for not cooking him eggs like the movie "Once Were Warriors"

De'Andre Johnson was not hitting a woman who refused to give him money!

De'Andre Johnson was not hitting a woman who refused to give him sexual favors!

De'Andre Johnson was not  even hitting a girl who only said insulting things to him!



De'Andre Johnson defended himself against an abled-body adult aggressor!


AS for that female aggressor, she wants to start a fight with a man? She better have Randa Rousey skills!


Because you know what? If you're a man up against a female aggressor, you don't have time to guess whether or not she has Randa Rousey skills. Just because someone is (let's say) 6 inches shorter than you, doesn't mean they can't seriously hurt you! There's smaller guys who can fight like a wild animal and can severely hurt a bigger guy who lacks aggressive tendencies and quick reflexes!




Here's a comment on the YouTube video


If you wanna act tough like a man, and hit a man, then you can sure enough get hit like a man. Us women need to understand these men ain't playin' this feminism (beep) no more. Just cause you're a women does NOT give you the right to be a complete cunt towards a man without any consequences.



THE REAL (profanity) HERE IS FLORIDA STATE ADMINISTRATION AND COACHING STAFF. They are so afraid of negative media they cut this kid loose.  As the mother of a boy.  I have taught my son not to hit women.  I taught him to respect women.  as the mother of a girl, I taught my daughter to act like a lady and you will be treated like a lady.  I don't condone violence however, If you get pissy drunk and attack someone I don't care if it is male or female chances are you are going to get hit back. To those women who think you can go around hitting men and not get hit back, WAKE up, it's not going to happen. This guy didn't walk up to the bar and sucker punch this girl. She clearly started it. To the writer who says that she didn't hit him hard enough to hurt him.How do you know what her intent was.  That didn't look like a LOVE  tap to me.  To me it looked like she gave it all she had.   Bottom line here is there is a DOUBLE STANDARD in place here.  You're saying tht if this girl had hit another girl she SHOULD be charged.  But, it's OKAY for her to hit a guy. ZERO tolerance means everyone.


And here's Whoopi Goldberg speaking on the same issue






or as one person said on facebook : Hey Equal Rights, Equal Fights!!


--------


Look, I have great respect for respectful women!

I have great respect for women who rise to the top of their industry!

I have great respect for female athletes!

I have great respect for REAL victims of domestic violence and sexual assaults!  

(women who start fights with men and get punched by men defending themselves DO NOT count as REAL victims of domestic violence) 

I have great respect for the hard-working single mothers who sacrifice so that their children can have something to eat and a roof over their head!

I have great respect for the many women I have worked with at various job sites over the years!

I have great respect for the many female teachers I have had!

I have great respect for the strong women I grew up with in public housing who gave me tons of respect! 

--------------

But I am tired of this crap that "men don't have the right to defend themselves against violent women" 

I'm tired of those few women who play victim when they lose fights that they have started! 

It is those few violent women who disrespect the real struggle women historically (and even currently) have to go through just
  • to make use of their talents
  •  to get an education
  • to have the right to vote
  • to gain leadership positions 
  • to not be abused at home 
  • to walk outside at night without fear
  • to live without fear of rape
  • to live with dignity
  • to even have basic respect

That woman at the Tallahassee bar ought to be ashamed of herself and need to publicly apologize for disrespecting the real struggles of women out there!
 
 

Monday, July 06, 2015

2015 Women's World Cup

The 2015 Women's World Cup, held in the Great White North (aka Canada) has just come to an end!


1) The Big Game

AS we all know by now, yesterday's championship game  with USA vs Japan was a rematch of the 2011 championship!  Whereas Japan won in 2011, this time USA won without showing mercy. 3 goals in the first 16 minutes?  So much for the nonsense about "soccer being boring"! Japan tried to catch up, but it wasn't enough this time! The USA team partied like it's 1999 all over again!




2) Grass & Turf

 This year, the games were played on turf instead of grass! That has gotten a lot of controversy, with  people saying "it's not fair men play on grass, women play on turf"  and "playing on turf will cause a lot of injuries."


But there were no mass levels on injuries on turf this year!


But if the players still prefer to play on grass, then let them play on grass!





3) People are Watching
 As usual the trolls came out with the attitude of "ha,ha nobody watches the woman play" But the trolls are not deterred by  ................ The Facts! 

http://time.com/3946656/womens-world-cup-breaks-ratings-record/

The United States’ Women’s World Cup win on Sunday broke a ratings record, garnering more viewers than any other soccer match in television history, according to broadcaster Fox Sports. 
“It is the highest metered market rating ever for a soccer game in the U.S. on a single network,” Fox Sports wrote in an official announcement of the ratings triumph.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/07/06/420514899/what-people-are-saying-about-the-u-s-women-s-world-cup-win


Citing Nielsen, Telemundo says that its Spanish-language U.S. broadcast of Sunday's final "delivered 1.27 million total viewers... becoming the most watched game of a FIFA Women's World Cup in U.S. Spanish-language TV."
 (skipped paragraphs)

While some 17 million American viewers tuned in to the 7 p.m. ET start of Sunday's game, that number quickly grew to 21.86 million an hour later — and reached 22.86 million at 8:30 p.m. ET, according to preliminary data from industry website TV Media Insights.

Those figures are comparable to the 2014 World Series' Game 7, which attracted 23.5 million viewers — far more than any other game of the 2014 series.

(and even more)

The final drew "a prodigious 15.2/27 metered market household rating/share" from 7-9 p.m. ET, Fox says, citing data from the Nielsen ratings service. The network adds that the audience "peaked at 18.3/31 from 8:45-9:00 p.m. ET," as more Americans tuned in to watch the celebrations in Vancouver. 
As a comparison, consider that the Golden State Warriors' recent title-clinching Game 6 victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers in the NBA Finals earned a 15.9 overnight rating. That figure was hailed as a Game 6 record for ABC in a Finals series that drew the highest average numbers since the Michael Jordan era. 

So in other words, women's soccer championship game gets nearly as much ratings as the championship games of traditional male American sports! 

Super Bowl  still dominates the ratings, but let's face it, most of us watch the Super Bowl for the ads and the halftime show!



and some more commentary.

From The Nation's Dave Zirin (note the sarcastic article title)
http://www.thenation.com/article/why-im-done-defending-womens-sports/


Every damn Women’s World Cup, every NCAA women’s finals, every Olympics, women’s sports again go on a media trial that would make the old judges of Salem blush. This last e-mail was merely the latest. I have done too many radio shows in the past week where the question was not about the chances of the US Women’s national team or which teams could potentially topple them. They were about why “no one cares,” or whether women’s sports are as good as men’s sports. It’s tired.
It’s also way behind where people actually are. Absolutely, it is great to see Seth Myers and Amy Poehler take up the fight, and it is always fun to see the look on someone’s face when you tell them that John Wooden in his last years preferred women’s NCAA basketball to the men’s game. But it’s also increasingly irrelevant. While I’m being asked why “no one cares,” the Women’s World Cup is getting ratings that would make the NBA or Major League Baseball weep with joy. While ESPN Radio self-parody Colin Cowherd says that men are stronger and better athletes and we appreciate greatness in America and that’s why men’s sports is more fun to watch, his radio contract appears in peril because fewer and fewer people care what he has to say. While academic reports are issued that show only 2 percent of SportsCenter’s coverageis devoted to women’s sports, which is discussed there by anchors with the joy and flair of kids forced to “eat their vegetables,” more and more people are choosing to get their news from different sources if the current ones don’t meet their needs.


Though to be fair Colin Cowherd did say good things about the Women's World Cup championship game in this morning's show, and basically implied that the anti-soccer trolls are out of touch with modern times!

listen at
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=13208354&s=espn



4) Global Disparities


Another article from The Nation's Dave Zirin



http://www.thenation.com/article/african-artistry-and-anger-at-the-womens-world-cup/


What we can see is that, to an even greater degree than the men’s game, there are profound inequities in development and attention between regions of the globe: North America, Japan, China, and Europe flourish, while countries in Africa and Latin America suffer. They suffer from FIFA neglect and conscious disinterest amidst their own country’s soccer leadership, some of which only recently have taken the first halting steps toward taking the women’s game seriously. Yet the Women’s World Cup has revealed something else as well: the heroic ability and drive from the teams on the African continent to achieve in spite of the obstacles laid out in front of them. They may have been knocked out, but their progress has been profound and in many respects is the story of this tournament.

and

FIFA’s continuous smorgasbord of corruption and scandal can exhaust even the most ardent soccer enthusiast, which is why the women’s game and this World Cup are refreshing reminders of what is still a wonderful and unmarred game. In order to nurture the players and continue to grow the sport, we need to make sure that the investment is real and the progress continues. The beautiful game deserves more. In the words of the lion-hearted Clementine Toure, “I want to make an appeal to not only our federation, but to all of Africa, that women’s football has arrived. We believe in our women. We have a good team. Today the Ivory Coast showed it deserves a place in the World Cup. But we also deserved to be better prepared. We didn’t deserve to be humiliated.” The Ivory Coast, and all of the women’s teams in the Global South deserve not humiliation but resources. This World Cup has shown that if the economic playing field could be leveled, the actual playing field could delight and thrill the world to an even greater degree than it has already done.