Thanks for Nothing UH Radical Lefties

Even more evidence that the Ward Churchill lovers at UH gave Hawaii a negative rep.

http://www.starbulletin.com/2005/03/04/editorial/indexletters.html

As residents of California who visits your island every year, we are greatly saddened that the University of Hawaii has opened its arms to University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill. Your university has chosen to offer a platform to a man who is pushing hate and division.

[skipped a few paragraphs]

Now UH has showered him with love, as shown on the television here in California, with leis and chants of agreement. It has truly put UH in a different light for us.

We have always looked forward to attending a football game every October when we stay in Oahu. We always proudly display our Warrior shirts. So proud of being University of Hawaii fans. Not anymore. We are now ashamed to wear them.

Esther and Carl Belknap
Thousand Oaks, Calif.

However, the Radical Lefty nutcases at UH-Manoa don't care about the negative consequences UH and Hawaii in general recieved from inviting Ward Churchill to speak. People in the mainland have the wrong impression that Hawaii loves Ward Churchill, not understanding that 1) it was mainland-bred lunatics that invited Churchill to UHM and 2) the culture of restraint that many local Asians grew up in has protected Churchill from a barrage of boos and fists many feel like giving him and 3) fear of assault from Hawaiian sovereignty fascists and their lefty allies that also protected Churchill from a barrage of boos and fists.

Unfortunately, the action of the mostly white mainland-bred UH Radical Lefty profs has given mainlanders the impression that the large presence of Asians and Polynesians has made Hawaii "anti-American" and inviting to Ward Churchill. Unfortunately the white mainland-bred profs dont care about how their actions will hurt the reputation of Asians and Polynesians.

Another letter to Star Bulletin

http://www.starbulletin.com/2005/03/04/editorial/indexletters.html

Several years ago, I was speaking with one of our UH instructors. When I asked what he taught, he responded, "I teach the backside of American history." When I inquired what he meant by that, he said he taught the ugly side of America, the problems in America and the terrible things this country has stood for. I was incensed.

[skipped paragraphs]

The support of Churchill by some on the UH faculty reveals not their valuing of free speech, but their hatred for America. If Churchill's rantings serve to expose the radical teachings espoused on our campus and to awaken the populace, then it will have been worth all the commotion.

Ron Arnold
Kaimuki

Why do profs insist that their jobs is to counter-balance Fox News anyways? That's not their job. Plus, for many working students, most of their info on current events comes NOT from Fox News, but from the Radical Lefty profs! So the profs are counter-balancing NOTHING! They're indoctrinating the students with anti-capitalist, anti-military, anti-American agenda

Activists: Get Your Priorities Straight -Dammit!

Actress Jada Pinkett Smith visited Harvard University and supposedly offended the LGBT community.

Did she say the words "fag", "queer" or "dyke"? No

Did she call homosexuality an "abomination" or a "sin"? No

So what did Pinkett say?

http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110006369

Among the campus groups affiliated with the foundation is the Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender and Supporters Alliance, or BGLTSA, and it didn't like some of what it heard. A co-chair of the group, Jordan B. Woods, told Ms. Friedman that part of Ms. Pinkett Smith's speech was "extremely heteronormative, and made BGLTSA members feel uncomfortable." In other words, Mr. Woods and others in BGLTSA explained, by focusing on a heterosexual relationship, Ms. Pinkett Smith took such a narrow view that some in the audience felt left out.

Talking only about heterosexual relationships is "homophobic"?

Smith has no obligation to talk about homosexual relationships. She is a heterosexual, so she'll talk about what she knows about! So why should gays and lesbians expect her to talk about homosexual relations? She probably doesn't know much about it, so why expect her to talk about it?

Matthew Shepard wasn't killed by an actress talking only about heterosexual relationships!

People get assaulted and murdered over their perceived sexual orientation. A heterosexual man in Boise was viciously assaulted because one man in a bar mistaken him for being gay. (I heard about this in a video shown in a sociology class)

That is what gay-rights activists should be addressing. They shouldn't waste time over an actress not mentioning gay relationships in her speech.

What next - should I be offended if a man from Laos didn't mention a word about Mexican culture in his speech? No, I should be happy to learn about what's going on in Laos.

Truth about 9/11 Victims Churchill Doesn't Want You to Think About

Andrew Walden has said something about the investors killed in the 9/11 attacks that hasn't been said but should be said. Meanwhile, while Al-Quaida lover Ward Churchill insulted them.


Here are Walden's tribute to the investors murdered on 9/11

http://www.kaleo.org/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/02/28/4222b56d5f9f8?in_archive=1

Ward Churchill is wrong. Filthy-rich American financiers are not "little Eichmanns," but revolutionaries. We are freeing the world from the poverty and depredation created by socialism, feudalism, tribalism and dictatorship. By building and financing sweatshops, genetically modified agriculture and free trade, rich American bankers, stock traders and CEOs are giving billions of people the opportunity to earn cash wages for the first time in their lives or the lives of their ancestors.

Al-Qaeda and the anti-globalization Churchill left our counter revolutionaries against this Second Industrial Revolution, which has drawn absolute poverty down from 40 percent of the world's people to 21 percent in 20 years, according to a recent U.N. report on world poverty. It is Churchill and his comrades whose anti-development campaigns exacerbate the high infant-mortality rates that come from underdevelopment. It is they whose acts "translate into the rotting corpses of infants."