Wednesday, October 15, 2014

34 years of life

More reflections as another year of life go by.


Sore foot, bald spot and   even a few hairs turning white. I'm not getting any younger.

However, I'm getting closer to getting my master's in Libary and Information Sciences (LIS) while still working as a sub teacher.  I see great potential in my future.

I'm still  enjoying the various types of parties (block parties, karaoke parties, birthday parties, nightclubs, etc). 

I'm still enjoying working with the younger generation! 

I still enjoy bike rides on sunny days with trade winds.

Got more life to live!

1) I'm Old Enough to Remember.........


 I'm now old enough to remember things that the latest batch of young adults had to learn about in history books or documentaries. (ie. LA riots, OJ Simpson case, Berlin Wall going down, etc)

I'm old enough to remember when Weezer, Notorious BIG, Bone Thugs n Harmony, Green Day, Aaliyah, Toni Braxton were all "new artists".  That was 20 years ago! 


I'm old enough to remember when the year 2000 was considered THE FUTURE! Now, the kids of today didn't even exist in 2000, and much of the technology of 2000 is now considered obsolete!


I'm old enough to remember back in 1991, when it was announced that Magic Johnson had HIV! Everybody was like  "Oh  -----, he's going to be dead by the year 2000!" It's 2014 and he's not just surviving but thriving!

I'm old enough to remember when a popular rap song stated "we're not ready for a black president" and people truly felt that nobody with any non-European ancestry would be elected USA president within our lifetime.

I'm old enough to remember when same-sex marriage was just a fringe idea that people didn't take seriously. Now, it's legal in many states and is seen as inevitable that it will be legal nationwide soon!

I'm old enough to remember when legalized marijuana was also a fringe idea that people didn't take seriously. Now, 2 states legalized, a few more are likely to do so soon.

I'm old enough to remember when the Internet wasn't a part of most people's lives!

I'm old enough to remember when you either had to record a song from the radio, buy a CD with 10 junk songs just to hear 2 good songs, or risk never hearing that great song again!

I'm old enough to remember when you missed a funny or interesting moment on TV, that's it, that opportunity is probably gone forever! Makes you stuck to a TV at a schedule determined by some far-off corporate person not interested in how you want to live your life.

I'm old enough to remember when people graduated high school, they truly feel that they might never hear from each other again.  Same when people changed jobs. Which made transitions a truly heart-breaking moment.

I'm old enough to remember when keeping in contact with long-time friends/classmates/co-workers/etc. required playing phone tag, which makes you want to give up, NOT because you didn't like that person, BUT BECAUSE playing phone tag takes too much time!

I'm old enough to remember when  one of the teaching assistants I was working with yesterday was actually one of my students! Yes, one of the middle school students that I taught in my first year of substitute teacher (2005)  is now one of the teaching assistants I have worked with!

Now, THAT makes me feel old!




2) Improvements I've seen in my lifetime!


Now, look at some of these "I'm old enough to remembers" I have just mentioned!


We have much more access to information than before. We can still be in contact with each other without playing phone tag. We can have access to entertaining moments without being "held hostage" by a TV/radio schedule.


 While there are still some people who want to hurt those of other races, race isn't a limiting factor in achievement like it used to be.  It sure didn't stop Barack Obama!


We are now more understanding of those with differing sexual orientations and now see them as real human beings instead of seeing them as "freaks".  We are also becoming more understanding of people with other differences (ie. physical, mental, intellectual) as well.  An example is the campaign against the use of the word "retarded" when mocking things that don't make sense. 

We now starting to understand how dangerous government over-reach is, and are now questioning the "necessity" of using SWAT teams to stop marijuana.  The same is going on when it comes to police having military weapons and government agencies spying on our smartphones and emails.

And with social media, people are now more willing to see the BS behind the usual rhetoric, more willing to question oppression, and less likely to feel they are alone in their traumas. A great example is at  http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-victory-for-internet-age.html



3) Time and Wounds


 People say that time heals all wounds.

Time doesn't do it alone!

You need to let out your frustrations but do it appropriately. You want to do it at the appropriate time, but the appropriate time is hard to find.

Which is why blogs are such a psychological life-saver for many.

I wrote a blog post "Exposed to the Light" a few years ago. It was one of the best things I have ever done in my life.  It was risky (and probably still is)! But because I made it public, the anger was finally allowed to fade only because I put it out there! At this point in time, I pretty much forgive most of the names mentioned in that blog post. That wouldn't have been true if I never wrote it!

I did have a "friend" who felt I shouldn't have written that blog post, that I should've just "let it go". Well, I destroyed his cliches into pieces. But I'm not interested in destroying him as a person. I hope he does well and thrive in the future.

---

But certain things can't be solved with blog posts.

There comes a time you have to write messages to those in your inner circle that have hurt you! Writing those messages is great because you don't have to worry about being interrupted when writing those messages. You can get all your points across.

Even with that, there comes a time where you might have to talk to those people. Even better if it takes place on neutral ground (ie. counseling sessions with a trained professional).


The greatest thing that happened for me this year were the counseling sessions with my parents. I had great resentment towards my parents over some of their past decisions

 (read my earlier blog posts for more info, like this post, this post, part 1 of this post,  part 5 of this post , and part 3 of this post ).

When you're younger, you're not always able to effectively express those resentments. But with those resentments, they can build up over time, even when what you are resentful about it is over. 

But yeah, I wrote letters to my parents about my anger towards their decisions and how it had a negative psychologically effect on me.  What got their attention was how I expressed some of the rage I had.

Then they finally said what I needed to hear for a long time: "Please schedule an appointment with a trained professional. Let us know when and we'll be there!" 

They kept that promise. We had our counseling sessions. I asked them some tough questions and they delivered real answers. I learned about the hard circumstances my parents grew up in and how some of those things traumatized them even today. We all gained a much greater understanding of each other.

We had to get this counseling sessions done this year. We're not getting any younger. My mother has recently retired, my father is retiring in a few years.  I could no longer wait until they face the inevitable decline of old age. Also, I had a few more decades before retirement and I needed to find inner peace before it's too late.

The psychologist in charge of our counseling session is a great human being. He was able to show understanding of all sides without favoring one.  For privacy purposes, I won't mention his name, but I do want to thank him big time.

He also mentioned this song by Crosby,Stills, Nash and Young "Teach Your Children"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QimgEmzlbbA  (video with lyrics)

The song is about how it's difficult for parents & children to understand each other's circumstances.
The song has a very emotional meaning to me considering the circumstances discussed during the counseling sessions.


My parents may not have made the best decisions while raising me. My parents may have overlooked various warning signs that made things worse for me.

But I do know this - they do love me and have been doing so throughout all 34 years of my life! 

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Explorers, Discoverers and Conquerors

Yesterday was Columbus Day, to honor the person who "discovered" America.

Here is my facebook message that I posted yesterday


If all Columbus wanted to do is find lands unknown to him, I wouldn't have much of a problem.

It's the following that's the problem

Columbus treated the natives brutally. Columbus demanded treasure, food and sex for his men, and when the Lucayans refused, he ordered their noses and ears cut off to serve as a warning.
• Columbus treated his conquered people harshly. When the Lucayans rebelled, Columbus crushed the rebellion and carted off 500 Lucayans to be sold into slavery in Europe. 




And if that article isn't enough to outrage, look what I found in this following article

"Columbus Day? True Legacy: Cruelty and Slavery" by Eric Kesum


Shockingly, Columbus supervised the selling of native girls into sexual slavery. Young girls of the ages 9 to 10 were the most desired by his men. In 1500, Columbus casually wrote about it in his log. He said: "A hundred castellanoes are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and it is very general and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten are now in demand."



That's right : Christopher Columbus was a child molesting, sexual abusing pedophile!

Do any of you Conservative Correctness people still want to celebrate that guy's holiday?

Or is saying "hey, look at me everyone, I'm pissing off liberals by being politically incorrect" that important to you?

Thursday, October 09, 2014

Foot Problems

I already have hard time with shopping for shoes due to my wide feet.

Also, I prefer Velcro over shoe laces. That means I order shoes online (New Balance).


However, I have noticed that the shoe on the right side rapidly wears down in the same area. Different shoe, same problem.

Then I looked at my feet when I walk and I noticed that my left foot is pointed (mostly) straight ahead, but my right foot is really pointed to the right as you can see below.


Pablo Wegesend's photo


So to prevent rapid wearing down on the right shoe's heel area,  I tried to change my walking pattern with my right foot pointing more straight ahead.

Wrong Move!

That was when the pain in my right foot started. It has been hurting in the foot's arch.


I have stopped changing my walking pattern a month ago.  I still have the pain in the foot's arch!


I can still walk. But now I have to walk slower! Can't really run! 


-----

I remember hearing the radio ads for Step Ahead Hawaii, who promised "free foot analysis". 

They don't analyze your foot. They just ask you to walk and make a footprint. Then the salesperson persuades to buy an orthotic for your feet.

Don't fall for it!

The orthotic feels like walking on squishy ball at first, but after a while, it starts to feel like there's a square wooden block stuck under my 1/4 of my foot. 

Not worth it!

Plus, the salesperson is sleazy. He has this big bold personality who gestures with big hand motions while talking! It's just like the salesman in the movies!

---------

I went to Kaiser Moanalua clinic to get a second opinion. The doctor actually analyzed my foot as well as my walking pattern.

My right foot's arch has experienced some strain.

But this time, I had a foot cast so that I could get a custom-made orthotic, instead of a generic one sold by Step Ahead Hawaii.

The orthotic is supposed to come in a few weeks.

------

So yeah, I'm walking slower than usual. It's not easy because the rest of my body wants to go at a faster  pace, but if I do, my right foot would wince in pain!

Meanwhile, if I do have to walk fast (for example - crossing a street), I'm putting pressure on my other foot so I don't feel the pain in the right foot's arch!


The pain comes and goes. It's not 24-7 (yet).

Yet, I don't want to stop living life.

I did attend the Ho'olaule'a block party in Waikiki the other week and I survived. (Yes, I did walk slower than usual)


My birthday is coming up and I want to go the clubs like I usually do in the weekend  that comes after my birthday. I just can't make big footwork like you see the professional stage dancers do!  I won't even try to "Jump Around" to House of Pain's song, so I'll just bounce my upper body instead.

Also, Halloween is coming up and Waikiki is where the action is, especially Kalakaua Avenue. Well, it's crowded, so everyone is going to be walking slow anyways.  I still want to go to the Halloween party at one of the clubs, especially since Halloween is on a Friday this year.

---------

I already gained weight in the last 2 years, so I still have to move around to prevent more weight gain. (yeah, I have to eat less too).

I did use the elliptical cross trainer at the YMCA, just at a slower pace. 

I did ride my bike the other day, but I have to watch how much pressure I put on my right foot.

----

AS for the shoes, I had "heel guards" installed which gets replaced every few weeks.

http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-photo-shoe-heel-protector-macro-isolated-image11982525

A much better way for preventing wear & tear on your shoes than changing walking patterns. 
And easy on your wallet too!


-----

Well, the custom-made orthotic should be coming soon. Hopefully, it would help! I want my foot arch pain to be a "just a phase" instead of  "the new normal".





Saturday, September 27, 2014

Water bottles banned from field trips

On 9/23/2014, students from Maili Elementary School went to a field trip to the State Capitol.  They were NOT allowed to bring water bottles on the field trip. 

This isn't just a short ride. It's going from one side of the island to the other!  With no water allowed along the way!


http://khon2.com/2014/09/26/school-to-reassess-field-trip-policy-that-prohibits-students-from-bringing-lunch-water-bottles/


A day-long field trip for Maili Elementary School students drew complaints from some parents, because the kids were not allowed to bring their lunch or their water bottles.
One parent asked KHON2 to find out why.
Some of the kids are five years old, and they usually get their lunch in school before 11 a.m. Without water, some parents say it’s a big deal.
For kindergartener Holden Medeiros, it was his first field trip at the school and a new experience for his mom. She was concerned when she found out the kids would leave their lunches and water bottles in school.
“I asked about their water bottles, if they were able to take their water bottles, and (the teacher) said no because it would be too much responsibility to keep track of 21 water bottles and they might misplace it,” said Holden’s mother, Vee Medeiros.

and more

 To make matters worse, Medeiros said the chaperones were allowed to bring their own food and water.
“I counted three chaperones with the red-and-black bento containers, the ones with rubber bands on it. Three of them had that. They had water flasks,” Vee Medeiros said. 
So KHON2 went to the school office to ask the principal why it had to be done this way.
The principal didn’t want to talk on camera, but shortly after our visit, Medeiros got a call from the Department of Education saying the school needs to change its policy when it comes to field trips.

and this

The principal also emailed a statement saying out of more than 120 kindergarteners, they received only two complaints.

Well, I found the principal (Suzie Lee) and her email (Suzie_Lee@hawaiidoe.org) at the following website
http://www.hawaiipublicschools.org/ParentsAndStudents/EnrollingInSchool/SchoolFinder/Pages/Maili-Elementary.aspx



And here's my email to Suzie_Lee@hawaiidoe.org


This email is notify you that I am one of many who are outraged that your school has banned students from bringing water bottles on field trips!  

Children dehydrate very easily and you could've had a child die on the field trip. You might say "no worries, no one died this time". Well, not everyone dies when a person drives drunk but that's no excuse! 

One of your  teachers have been quoted as saying "it would be too much responsibility to keep track of 21 water bottles WHAT?  That's their job, if they don't like it, they should find another job! I have led children on field trips, and DAMMIT, we should EMBRACE being responsible for all those water bottles!!!! It sounds like hard work, but that's what your teachers get paid to do! 


You are quoted on KHON2 news that " they received only two complaints." What you don't realize is that these things snowball! Meaning it starts with 2 complaints, this stuff goes viral (and I have posted a link to the story on facebook, with my friend's list spanning several countries).
The other parent will start to feel emboldened to speak out and once that happens, it will be hard to contain all that anger!  

Your school serves a historically oppressed population, some of whom might feel "what's the use of complaining". But once they see that others they know are taking a stand, their anger will be very hard to contain!  By insulting your school's community, you are playing with fire!

Please do the right thing - hold a community meeting, apologize without defensiveness and resign!


Mahalo, 
Pablo Wegesend

PS: This email will be posted on my blog, and so will any defensive, sarcastic and negative responses to this email. 

Tuesday, September 09, 2014

video-recorded incidents shown to the public

NFL player Ray Rice got a tiny suspension (just 2 games) for hitting his wife and dragging her body out of the elevator.

Obviously, the tiny suspension caused outrage when compared to NFL players who got suspended longer for substance abuse.

But now, the elevator camera showing Ray Rice actually knocking out his wife exposed even more the folly of just suspending him for 2 games.

Now we know it's not one of those "crazy lady hits husband, husband hits back" but more like  "husband hits first AND knocks her out"


Video is very valuable for portraying what really did happen!

Which was why it's an outrage the Ferguson didn't have recording equipment on the cop's car or on the uniform when the Micheal Brown shooting incident occurred.
--


Of course, some are upset that the elevator camera video of Ray Rice knocking out his wife has gone public. It has been said that it will re-traumatize his wife more, knowing that she will relive the incident again.


Dave Zirin's "Revictimizing of Janay Rice"
http://www.thenation.com/blog/181523/revictimizing-janay-rice

The one question they did not glaringly ask is, How will Janay Rice react to the release of the tape? The absence of concern for Janay Rice—in the press, on social media, among my own colleagues—is the most disheartening part of this entire ordeal.
No one cares that she is now going to have to relive this incident over and over again. No one cares that the world has now become privy to what may be the most humiliating moment of her entire life.




But sometimes, incidents need to be made public.

Do you think Rodney King like to have the video of him being beaten by cops repeatedly  shown on TV?


 He had to live with that a few years after the incident.  Even years later, while randomly changing the stations, he would find himself accidentally running to the infamous video being played again.


Same with Reginald Denny, who was brutalized by racist mobs during the LA Riots. His beating was recorded by the helicopter camera, and it was shown repeatedly on TV! For years! Even years later, while randomly changing the stations, he would find himself accidentally running to the infamous video being played again.


Nobody wants to see their most traumatizing moment on public display.

But sometimes, the public interest requires that we see the brutality, that it affects real people, that it has worse consequences than a video game!

Sometimes, the public interest requires that we see the brutality, whether it's done by law enforcement, celebrities, rioting mobs and drunken youth!

I'm sorry that Rodney King, Reginald Denny and Janay Rice (and other victims of brutality) have to see their most traumatizing moments on public display, and the added psychological damage it may cause.

At the same time, the public needs to be made aware that these incidents do happen in real life, and that it's not a game!



Saturday, August 23, 2014

Ferguson, Police, and Race

Ferguson, a small town outside of St. Louis, Missouri has been placed on the map since August 9, 2014, when a police officer stopped Micheal Brown. There has been conflicting reports about what happened between the officer and Brown, and what hasn't been in dispute was that the officer shot Brown.

There was no video recording of the incident. The police car had no dash-cam.  There were no hidden camera on the police officer's uniform. In a world where nearly every cell phone has video-recording capabilities, it is unacceptable for any police department to send its officers in cars or uniforms without hidden video-recorders!

from Mona Charen's article 


Beyond that, a technical solution is readily available: cameras, cameras and more cameras. I wrote last year that cameras should be ubiquitous in prisons because the temptation for brutality by prison guards who are unobserved is tremendous. The same is true of police. 
The Wall Street Journal reports that in Rialto, California, the number of citizen complaints against police declined from 24 to 3 in the first year officers began wearing cameras on their chests. Use of force incidents dropped from 61 to 25.

why is that ?
Wearable cameras are being tested in New Orleans, Los Angeles and Las Vegas. As Rialto's police chief explained: "When you talk about putting a camera on somebody, human nature is going to dictate that you're going to mind your p's and q's and you're going to be on the best behavior. At the same time, I think it's had an impact on citizens. If they know you're wearing a camera, they too will be on their best behavior."



So why would the Ferguson Police Department not have cameras on every police car and on every officer?

Is it because they got something to hide?


Apparently they do, because they banned media companies have flying helicopters over riot scenes, because they worry that helicopter cameras would catch the militarized officers abusing their power.


Last week, when the protests began, the Federal Aviation Administration banned low-flying vehicles—vehicles like news helicopters—below 3,000 feet over Ferguson airspace, in order “to provide a safe environment for law enforcement activities.” The no-fly-zone was created at the request of local law enforcement, following a police report that a police chopper had been shot at. Yesterday, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixonrenewed the ban, citing the same police-safety justification.
The police safety justification is hard to buy. What possible threat could a news helicopter, circling hundreds or thousands of feet above the scene, be to the activities on the ground? If anything, helicopters, which would not block emergency vehicles, which would not get in the way of cops or crowds, which would remain at a remove from the action, would be safer than the rest of the media.
No, safety isn't the issue. That's not what this is about. It’s about local law enforcement not wanting to be watched—and not wanting media to capture a complete picture of the scene.

-----


Another use if the use of military equipment by the police.

While there was looting (much of it done by criminals who took advantage of a tense atmosphere..............I mean how is running with a whole bunch of shoes an act of "promoting social justice")  much of the police officers were using their big weapons against peaceful protesters.








Mark Steyn


As for what's happened in the days since the shooting, I've written a lot in recent months about the appalling militarization of the police in America, and I don't have much to add. But I did get a mordant chuckle out of this line from Kathy Shaidle on the green-camouflaged officers pictured above: 
Shouldn't a 'Ferguson' camo pattern be, like, 7/11 & Kool-Aid logos? 
Indeed. To camouflage oneself in the jungles of suburban America, one should be clothed in Dunkin' Donuts and Taco Bell packaging. A soldier wears green camo in Vietnam to blend in. A policeman wears green camo in Ferguson to stand out - to let you guys know: We're here, we're severe, get used to it.


Back to the Mona Charen article
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/charen081914.php3


 Actors often say that they can't get into character until they don the costume — attach the fake nose or moustache. It's easy to believe that something of the same effect happens when police gear up in opaque helmets, gas masks, body armor and heavy weaponry. If you're dressed and equipped like a special ops combat soldier, you're more inclined to behave like one. But against whom?


It's like all those commemorative images you see on TV about "a devoted father, loving husband, true gentleman and ................... a war hero".

I mean, you can truly be a devoted father, loving husband, a true gentleman ...................but once the combat uniforms and equipment is on
, don't tell me you're not ready to be a vicious warrior out to damage the living crap out of your enemy!

Now, that is necessary to fight insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.................but not against protesters armed only with a loud mouth!


But with riot gear on, you're so ready for battle that you treat any loudmouth as if he/she is an insurgent!

With riot gear on, you're so ready for battle that you start treat anyone armed only with a video-recorder as an enemy!

With riot gear on, you're so ready for battle, that you will to crack heads and shot tear gas at anyone without riot gear!

-------------


What is a small town like Ferguson doing with so much military equipment anyways.



In the name of "homeland security", the military has been giving out surplus equipment to police departments nationwide.


The original plan was to give such equipment to areas vulnerable to terrorist attacks (ie. Washington DC, New York, etc)!

But Congress being what it is (filled with people representing states and  specific districts), everyone wanted a piece of the action, so even remote small towns got militarized equipment.

--------

going back to the fear of looting ---- while much of that was going on ...................... there were also many who were BOTH outraged at the police AND the looters, as you could see from this video
https://vine.co/v/M3aJDOgX7xg


and the Huffington Post article

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/16/ferguson-protesters-guard-stores_n_5684042.html




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/16/ferguson-protesters-guard-stores_n_5684042.html
Protecting a beauty shop from looters

Twitter/HuffingtonPost




------------------------------------


Of course, since the Ferguson case started out with an incident of European-American cop killing an African-American suspect, this brings up the race relations issue.


And when that happens, everyone relives their bad memories of dealing with someone of a different race.

Of course, people fear being attacked (and killed) by someone different more than someone similar.

There has been talk by many right-wing conservatives about "why are African-Americans more worried about white police when they're more likely to be victimized by black-on-black crimes".

But it is many right-wing conservatives who promote the fear of the "Central American illegal" or the "Muslim terrorist" when they don't even pose the level of threat to an average European-American that another European-American does.

I mean, a daughter of a Euro-American conservative
is much, much, much, much, much more likely to get drugged and raped by a European-American frat boy than she would by some Central American, African-American  or Middle Eastern person!

I wrote about the issue on my 2013 blog post "Fear of the Other"
http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-fear-of-other.html


As for the conservative correctness slander that Sharpton/Obama/etc don't pay attention to "black on black crime"?

http://reason.com/archives/2014/08/21/what-about-black-on-black-crime


"What about black-on-black violence?" demanded Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum, who is white. "Where is Al Sharpton on that? Where is the president on that?"
Funny you should ask. Sharpton made a publicized trip to Chicago in November to focus attention on the city's chronic violence. Last year, Michelle Obama attended the funeral of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old black honor student who was shot, allegedly by a black gang member.
The first lady later returned to Chicago to converse with students at a school that is nearly 100 percent African-American. "In choosing Harper High School for the visit, the White House noted that 29 current or former students there had been shot in the last year, eight of them fatally," reported the Chicago Tribune.
The president also traveled to Chicago, meeting with kids involved in a mentoring program for at-risk adolescent boys, bemoaning gun violence and telling a crowd on the South Side, "Our streets will only be as safe as our schools are strong and our families are sound."
Doesn't sound like they've been ignoring or excusing this sort of violence. Plenty of black leaders and organizations in Chicago and elsewhere spend a lot of time and energy trying to prevent crime in their communities. There are rallies, conferences, prayer vigils and gun turn-in days. Last year, thousands of volunteers manned "Safe Passage" routes to get children to school unharmed.


--------------

In a blog post that  was posted on the George Zimmerman verdict (http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2013/07/after-trial-george-zimmerman-and.html), I mentioned that massive urban racial riots are a thing of the past. I spoke too soon.  

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Tom Apple and Ben Jay

UH-Manoa chancellor Tom Apple was fired last month by UH President Dave Lassner.


What is a chancellor anyways, and how is that different from a university president?

I gave a little lesson in a recent letter to the Star Advertiser.


Chancellor for Manoa campus
Do you want someone to be a principal of a high school while being the superintendent of the Department of Education at the same time? Probably not, because that is an obvious conflict of interest. 
Yet, we have recent columns by Dave Reardon and Dave Shapiro asking why the University of Hawaii system has separate positions for UH president and UH-Manoa chancellor. They asked why the responsibilities of both positions could not be done by the same person, like it used to. 
With the UH system consisting of three university campuses and all the community colleges, it would be an obvious conflict of interest for one person to be the chancellor (equivalent to a principal) of the Manoa campus and yet be the president of the entire UH system at the same time. 
Pablo Wegesend

--------------



Lassner said he had no confidence in Apple's ability to stabilize finances for the Manoa campus. Apple's supporters said that he has responsive to student concerns and think that Apple's attempt to fire the university's Cancer Center  director angered some powerful people.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/newspremium/20140801_UH_leader_defends_Apples_firing.html





I wonder if the true reason for Apple's firing has nothing to do with the stated reasons, but everything to do with Apple's statement in May 2013 about UH-Manoa's sports team going to Division II.

http://www.kaleo.org/sports/could-uh-athletics-leave-division-i/article_930fd484-b5f6-11e2-9ff7-001a4bcf6878.html
“If we’re not breaking even in three years, I really have to look at whether we will continue Division 1A athletics,” Chancellor Thomas Apple said.


I responded by saying...................................... Tom Apple should be fired

http://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2013/05/jason-collins-and-tom-apple.html

Excuse me?

Your telling us that the flagship university of our state shall be demoted to Division 2?
That's like asking Hawaii's people to accept 2nd class citizenship!We refuse to be treated like 2nd class citizens dammit! 
By telling us (and the world) that it's possible that UH athletics could drop out of Division 1 is an early Christmas present to all rival college recruiters!

That's right, all the folks at Fresno State, Stanford, Oregon, Southern Cal, UCLA, Boise State, Nevada, UNLV, BYU, Utah ....................... and on and on  ..................... now have a new weapon to use against us when they go out for recruiting! 

In other words, Tom Apple's words can have serious ramifications for the UH sports programs. Therefore, Tom Apple shall be fired!

At the time, Dave Lassner was not yet the UH President.  Lassner was new to his current position when he fired Tom Apple, but I'm not surprised Apple's May 2013 statement was a major part of the reason Lassner fired Apple.

It's just that Lassner smart enough not to publicly mention it, otherwise, there will be screams that "sports take too much priority at UH"


------

And now UH-Manoa's Athletic Director Ben Jay just said mentioned a possibility that UH football might become non-existent if the financial problems continue.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/20140818_Jay_issues_statement_to_clarify_earlier_comments.html?id=271782181


After earlier in the day telling a Board of Regents committee, "there is a very real possibility of football going away," under questioning by the board, Jay said issued the following statement:

"My comments at the Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics' meeting were made in order to convey a sense of urgency regarding the need to address our current funding model. In no way was I indicating that a decision on program reduction of any sport was under consideration. Rather, I was suggesting that the department's financial situation required that all possible scenarios be reviewed.

But just like Tom Apple's statements in May 2013, Ben Jay's comments will motivate rival college football  coaches to tell  recruits "don't go to Hawaii, their A.D. gave hints there'll be no football team before you graduate".



So Ben Jay might not be around much longer. And when  he's fired, the officially stated reasons may not match reality ................... that Ben Jay would be fired for even implying UH football might not be around much longer.