Saturday, December 09, 2023

some thoughts on Israel/ Palestine

 Being that the Israel/Palestine crisis has so many complexities that I don't have time to write a comprehensive essay, I'll just post the most concise thoughts at this time. For those who want to scream "what about this and what about that?", I only post in my limited free time.

Many of the overseas protesters have a limited view of the Israel/Palestine based on sources that confirm their narrative.

Many allegedly "woke" protesters seem to think Israel is one big "red state on steroids". Yes, there are some people (and communities) that fit that stereotype.

But Israel (like most countries) has areas that are more conservative and areas that are more liberal.

Much of the kibbutzes/villages/etc that were attacked by Hamas were liberal pacifist communities. Same with the festival that was attacked

Hamas KNEW THIS and attacked them because they were easy targets that were less likely to fight back.

Notice they didn't attack the more right-wing settler communities (which are truly more Islamophobic) because they're more likely to be armed and ready to shoot back.

Also notice that Hamas attacked on a holiday, when people are more likely to let their guards down.

In other words, Hamas are cowards.  

Hamas also KNEW that the allegedly "woke" leftists overseas are ignorant about the many liberal pacifist communities in Israel.

Israel intelligence agencies KNEW Hamas was ready & willing to launch a massive attack from Gaza.  Bibi Netanyahu KNEW this but didn't add more security near Gaza.

Why? Because I think Netanyahu WANTED the attacks to happen. He wanted the liberal pacifist villages/kibbutzes/festivals to be attacked to scare the rest of Israel into rallying around the leader (which be him) and also because he and his fellow right-wing nutcases wanted war with Palestine.

Netanyahu (like Trump) aren't overwhelmingly popular in their countries, they only win elections by small margins against a disorganized opposition. 

The opposition to Netanyahu in Israel was just starting the be more organized with massive protests in the streets.

How did Netanyahu respond? By having lax security near Gaza when he knew Hamas was planning an attack. 

In other words, Netanyahu was willing to allow other Jews to die, so that a now heavily traumatized nation will rally around him.  

And it will allow Netanyahu to do what his supporters wanted him to do, which was to start a massive war on Palestine.  

And when the bombs started dropping on Gaza (a small crowded area), it would definitely put civilians in danger. To add insult to injury, Netanyahu blocked humanitarian aid to Gaza.  For this, there is massive backlash against Israel

Meanwhile, the governments of Egypt and Jordan aren't even allowing Palestinian refugees to seek refuge there. They are just as complicit as Netanyahu in harming the Palestinian people. 

=======

As for overseas observers, while most liberals are horrified by both Netanyahu and Hamas, there is a disturbing trend on the Radical Left to make excuses for Hamas (and minimize their atrocities).

Hamas is not a progressive organization, they are ultra-conservative nutcases that want to replace Israeli oppression with Palestinian oppression.

But they fit the leftist narrative of "oppressed vs oppressors" nevermind that MUCH OF HISTORY includes revolutions that replaced one oppression with another.

The Palestinians were given their own state in Gaza in 2005, for them to do whatever they want. Hamas didn't even win a majority of the votes in 2006, they only got like 44% of the vote, but they won more votes than others. But they decided "We won this election, no more elections". So a whole generation came up and didn't get a chance to vote on whether they wanted the Hamas to continue being in power. 

Hamas could've used their chance to make Gaza a shining example to the world, to make Gaza into a prosperous place like Dubai. Instead, they used Gaza to launch more attacks on Israel. Hamas has no interest in making Gaza prosperous, they're only interested in taking all of Israel/Palestine "from the river to the sea" and starting a new Holocaust/pogrom on the remaining Jews left. 

But dummies overseas don't understand that Gaza was given a chance for a peaceful independence but Hamas decided otherwise.

Overseas dummies also think that Israel is a "white settler colony". While much of Western education focused on Israel as a refuge for Holocaust survivors, they left out the fact that MOST Israelis are descendants of Jewish refugees escaping persecution from Muslim-majority countries. But because most Jews in the USA are descendants of European Jews, people in the USA tend to think of Jews as "white". But the Europeans never thought of Jews as "white" and the Jews coming from the Middle East and Africa would never be seen as "white" by people who are asked "what race is that person?"

Even though I'm thousands of miles away from Israel/Palestine, and there are very few Jews or Arabs where I'm at, the few Israelis & Palestinians I did meet in real life look so much alike when they're not wearing their traditional gear. In fact, I remember subbing at one school and this one girl who identified as Palestinian looked so much like another girl from another school who identified as Jewish.

Israel/Palestine is less about "whites oppressing brown indigenous" and is more like Japan occupying Korea in the early 1900s or like the tribal rivalries turned deadly in places like Ethiopia and Rwanda. Most people from far away can't even tell those people apart but the people there can.

Hamas wasn't nice to the Asian & African migrant workers on the Israeli kibbutzes they attacked.

But allegedly "woke" dummies claim they're all about "#BlackLivesMatter" and "#StopAsian Hate"? Nonsense!

(also notice that the allegedly "woke" dummies claim to be intersectional feminists who scream "Silence is Violence", but they are silent about the misogynist violence  Hamas inflicted in their attack on Israeli villages/kibbutzes/festivals/etc. ) 

But allegedly "woke" dummies still wanted to claim the Israel/Palestinian crisis as "white Europeans vs brown indigenous" when Jews were there before the Arabs moved in. Israel/Palestine were ruled by so many outside entities (including but not limited to the Romans, Arabs, Turks, British, etc) that much of the population has mixed over the millennia

And yes some Jews who migrated to Europe mixed with the Europeans (which was why you see some really white Jews with blond hair and blue eyes). But doesn't erase the fact that those Jews also have DNA that is common among Middle Eastern people.

Let's put it this way: Jason Momoa is indigenous to Hawaii even though he has white skin and grew up in mostly "white" Iowa. But his Native Hawaiian ancestry is legit. 

The same is true for European Jews who moved to Israel, they are returning to their ancestral home, the same way Jason Momoa is returning to his ancestral home when he comes to Hawaii. 

For them, moving to Israel was returning home, like they finally found a place where they can be themselves, away from the historical persecution they faced in Germany, Poland, Russia, etc.

But the problem was some Jewish fanatics wanted Israel/Palestine all to themselves and inflicted terror on the Palestinian Arab population. his happened on a massive scale in 1948, and what was called "the Nakba". 

This is sort of like how the Europeans inflicted terror on Native Americans to move them out. But many European immigrants who came later (like the late 1800s, early 1900s) had NOTHING to do with the genocide of Native Americans, they just wanted to move to a place of opportunity. Same with the Latin Americans, Asians, and Middle Eastern immigrants who also came to the USA later in history.

Many of those who migrated to Israel post-1948 had nothing to do with the Nakba, just like those who migrated to the USA now had nothing to do with the genocide and slavery that had happened earlier. 

In the 1960s, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) started a violent resistance to Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. They launched attacks on Israeli civilians in schools, buses, planes and much more. Their allies murdered Israeli Olympic athletes in Munich in 1972.

By the early 1990s, there was the Oslo peace treaty between Israel and the PLO. And there was the famous handshake between PLO leader Yassir Arafat and Israel Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin with then US president Bill Clinton in the background. 

There was optimism in the air.

But some people didn't want peace.

Right-wing Israelis still wanted their version of "river to the sea" with all of Israel/Palestine under their control. One of them committed a mass shooting of Palestinian civilians in Hebron. Another assassinated Rabin for "being a traitor"

Meanwhile, Hamas also didn't want peace. They launched suicide/homicide bombings on Israeli cafes, parties, buses, you name it.

And with that, the dream of peace was dead!

Bibi Netanyahu took advantage of the crisis and won elections as Israeli Prime Minister.  He never had an overwhelming majority, but the opposition just didn't have enough support. 

It wasn't enough for Hamas to have Gaza. They wanted it all, "from the river to the sea".  It wasn't enough for the Israeli right-wing nutcases to just have a few settlements in West Bank, they wanted it all "from the river to the sea".

And viewing this all from thousands of miles away, it is heartbreaking  

Just recently, I was subbing at a Christian school and the students were watching a short animated video about the birth of Jesus. In that video was the message "Peace on Earth". And yet, in the part of the world, two-thousand years later, there is no peace. 😢

 



Sunday, November 26, 2023

Living a few hours without my smartphone

On Thanksgiving, I went to my parent's house. After leaving and coming back to my apartment, I realized that I left my cell phone at their house.

My apartment doesn't have a landline. I do have an extra cell (a flip-phone) but the SIM Card that connects the phone to the network was in my smartphone at my parent's house.

Lucky for me, I had a desktop computer where I could 

  • log-in to my Google account to "Find My Device" (this is for Android phones)
  • email my mom after noting the "Find My Device" located my phone is my parent's neighborhood.
The following day, I got my phone returned! 

If this happened 15 years ago, I would be out of luck. Back then, I didn't have a desktop computer at home (I had to use the libraries to do internet things) and I didn't have a landline or an extra phone. 

There are fewer pay-phones in the public now, and most of the ones that remain are vandalized. Plus, I don't feel comfortable speaking into a public device that attracts a lot of germs from users with poor hygiene. 

I'm also grateful my phone was with someone I trust.

Some people have to deal with the nightmare situation of losing their phones in public places and never seeing it again.

One piece of advice: Put a label with your name on the back of your cell phones.

I remember hearing that advice at a school office when I heard 2 staff members saying "we tell the kids to put their names on their items, but we don't even put our names on our cell phones"

Being that smartphones are expensive, it's definitely a good idea to place a label with your name on it, so in case you lose it and someone finds it, they'll have an idea of who to return it to. 

Riding the Rail that I Opposed

 Earlier this year, they finally opened part of Oahu's rail system. After decades of delays.


While it's officially called SkyLine, everyone here just calls it TheRail! 

On Thanksgiving morning, I finally got the chance to ride TheRail. 

I felt like a tourist. Even though I lived on this island my entire life!


While I initially opposed the building of TheRail, I ended up riding it. Yeah, I know, it sounds hypocritical.  I know I'm not the only one. 

Here's a blog post from 2004 opposing the building of TheRail 


Part of why I opposed the building of the rail was the use of eminent domain to confiscate property to make way for the rail.

I posed a question about it to the local papers back in 2006

Who will be forced to move for rail?

With all the talk about light rail, there is one question that needs to be answered: Who's going to be forced out of the way to make room for light rail infrastructure?

Pablo Wegesend
Honolulu

 

I also addressed such concerns in 2008

Property issue should have been addressed


Last Sunday's article on the possibility of people's property being confiscated to make room for the rail project addressed an issue that should have been addressed long before the City Council voted to approve rail.

I have previously written letters, as have others, warning about the possibility of people being forced off their land to make room for the light rail. I also wrote letters to the mayor and my City Council representative on this issue.

However, we have been ignored by nearly everyone.

I'm not against the idea of a rail system. I am against the idea of people's property being confiscated to make way for light rail (or any other project), and it's a shame very few have addressed this issue.

Pablo Wegesend

Honolulu


Guess what?

The issue came up again earlier this year and the city & county government is expanding the rail system into Kalihi, and now the government is threatening to confiscate land without consent to make way for the rail

from the Honolulu Star-Advertiser 11/17/2023 article (at https://archive.is/LcF8p )

The Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation’s board of directors Thursday approved filing an eminent domain against one family’s industrially zoned property in Kalihi.
The rail agency’s planned condemnation of property at 1829 Dillingham Blvd. also will force a nearly 60-year-old business to relocate.

and

In that year, HART said it presented an acquisition offer to the property’s named owner — Jennine Hatsue Takara — for the parcel’s full acquisition.
That offer, however, was rejected.
Over the years, the agency said it attempted several times to negotiate terms with the owner toward the property’s acquisition but to no avail.
By May, HART sent a notice to the City Council regarding its intentions to formally condemn the Takara family’s Dillingham Boulevard property, despite its owners’ objections.

In other words "take my offer or else" 

It's the Suge Knight way of doing business. No it's worse than that, because the government has more enforcers with more weapons than Suge Knight! 


My Friend Stuart Hayashi wrote a letter to the newspaper earlier this month 

HART’s Eminent Domain Is Brutal Use of Authority

The front-page story, “HART Board Approves Eminent Domain Filing for Kalihi Property” (Star-Advertiser, Nov. 17), shows HART has no heart.

The Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) invoked eminent domain to dispossess the Takara family of land on which their family business has stood for 59 years. Rationalizations for eminent domain always mention payment to the victims. That downplays the real issue: freedom and consent versus coercion. Eminent domain is ultimately backed by armed force. Enforcing it in Los Angeles in 1959 had armed officers literally drag a widow, Aurora Arechiga, from her home.

People assume cities need eminent domain. In January, I emailed development officials of Carson City, Nev., about this. They informed me that although the city can enact it, at the time they knew of no instance of Carson City actually exercising eminent domain in its history.

During these holidays, ponder whether slogans about “the greater good” are justification enough, and if passively condoning eminent domain’s brutality is what we truly want.

Stuart K. Hayashi


Stuart Hayashi expands on this more in his blog post "Eminent Domain is Inhumane" at                                                             

https://stu-topia.blogspot.com/2023/11/eminent-domain-is-inhumane.html 

A brief reflection on old blog posts

It seems like an eternity since I posted the blog post commemorating the 2-decade anniversary of this blog!



Being that it's been a month since I last posted, it kinda give a vibe that the anniversary post was going to be my last one. Luckily, it's not! 

Recently, I did look over some of the old blog posts. 

Some of them I read now and I ask myself "did I really need to express those thoughts so aggressively?"

Some of them mentioned public figures that were well-known then, but have since been forgotten by the general public (ie John Kerry, Howard Dean, Mike Huckabee,  Bill O'Reilly, Jeremiah Wright, etc)

While some issues mentioned back then are now in the rear-view mirror for most Americans (ie the US-Iraq war), some of the issues are still major topics of the day (ie Israel-Palestine conflict)

The great thing about being in the blogging world for 2 decades is seeing the evolution of my thoughts. Some of my perspectives and priorities changed over the years. 

Anyways, I'll be blogging until I can't do it anymore!





Sunday, October 29, 2023

2 decades of blogging, 1 decade on YouTube

 I now have 2 decades of experience in blogging and 1 decade of making YouTube videos.


First, my blogging.

To learn the history behind my blogging, check out the following posts

from 2013 "1 decade anniversary of this blog"    https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2013/10/1-decade-anniversary-of-this-blog.html

Actually, I joined Blogger in April 2003 as part of a group blog called "The Fiftieth Star". That was with me, Stuart Hayashi and a few others who wanted to promote an alternative to the center-left bias of the Ka Leo, the Honolulu daily papers and the Honolulu Weekly.
http://50thstar.blogspot.com/

(yeah, I know, it hasn't been updated in a while)

At the time, I was an undergraduate student at UH-Manoa and have been writing opinion articles in the school's newspaper Ka Leo O Hawaii.

As a writer, I had a small group of fans. But I also had an enemy named Tobin Jones who wrote screaming rants in response to my articles. I don't mind rational disagreements with my points, but Tobin Jones doesn't do rational disagreements, he does vicious slanders and accusations of me believing in stuff I dont believe in. 


Well in October of 2003, Tobin Jones made another unhinged rant about another of my Ka Leo articles.  Now, this was war! 

So I started my blog. I shattered his cliches into pieces.

Eventually, that conflict faded and I used my blog to comment on a whole bunch of other topics.  



I also wrote more on my blog history in this 2018  blog post " This blog is now 15 years old" https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2018/10/this-blog-is-now-15-years-old.html

Anyways, lots of things have changed in those 15 years!

Back then,  things like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter didn't even exist yet! But now, they're the center of many news reports and basically the center of mainstream life!

Back then, the word "viral" still focused on diseases! The word now refers to anything widely shared on YouTube, facebook and twitter (as I mentioned, didn't exist yet when I started my blog).

Interestingly, 2 years after that post, the coronavirus crisis has happened, so now, the word "viral" has now focused on viruses again. 

More from that 15th-anniversary post

Also within the 15-year time-frame, my life circumstances and some opinions do change.

Back in 2003, I was 23 years old and still an undergraduate student at UH-Manoa.  This "real world" that older people talk about? What is that?

Since then, I've started working different jobs in very different work environments, with the main one being a substitute teacher (that one started in 2005). That means I had serious role model responsibilities, for which I really had to mature! Some perspectives, attitudes and behaviors had to change! 

Which was why some former classmates were shocked when I no longer had the same attitudes and opinions that I had when I was a student in high school.

So yes, you might notice that some blog posts from 2003 and the few following years will have opinions that are different from what I express in recent years.

Part of that is growth & maturity, but part of that is also the changing world around us.


And yes, I have evolved more since that 2018 post, mostly due to the coronavirus crisis that started in 2020.  

I'll just say I've become more germophobic and less likely to attend public events. 

More classic paragraphs from the 15th-anniversary post

Some people might ask "why you put so much stuff on your blog, aren't you worried about how people might react?"

What do you mean "so much stuff"?

Actually, there's so much stuff I was planning to blog about, but haven't had the time to add it to my blog!

Of course I think of how people are going to react. Everyone does! 

But you have to take risks in life! You can't satisfy everyone! 

If you're not telling your story,
 someone else who don't have your best interests at heart will tell the world your story from their point of view.

That's not something you want to risk in a "viral" world, where people have their 15-minutes of fame when they least expect it!

People can write what they want about me, I can still write my side of the story! 


============

And now, about my 1 decade on YouTube,

My YouTube channel  is https://www.youtube.com/@pablo_wegesend 


It was October 2013 when I finally got a smartphone.

So yes, it's now a decade since I got my first smartphone, which I blogged about  at "One decade with a smartphone"   https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2023/10/one-decade-with-smartphone.html


So now that I have a video-recording device that can fit into my pocket, I can finally make video speeches that I can post online.

Plus, I can reach more people on YouTube than I could with just a blog. 

At the time, I still didn't have a desktop computer at home and had to go to the library to use the computer. 

Also, at the time, I just returned to UH-Manoa as a graduate student.  A contrast to when I started my blog as an undergraduate student.

At the time, the campus's Sinclair Library had computers that had an SD drive where I could upload videos I took with my smartphone and put in on YouTube.

In September 2015, I finally got my own desktop computer. That computer came with Windows Movie Maker, a video-editing app.

So if you watch my earlier videos, you notice

  • they're unedited, I just upload what I recorded
and whereas if you watch the videos I posted later, you will notice
  • Videos now start with a title thumbnail
  • Videos now end with a "Thank you for watching" and sometimes, with credits
  • I can cut out stuff from the video before I upload
  • I can add captions to the videos, plus additional images
And with the desktop computer, I now have Music Maker apps, and I have become a digital musician named Pablo the Mad Tiger Warrior

So I can add my music to the start and end of my video speeches, for the purpose of cross-promotion

And with Windows Movie Maker, I can now mix still images, color effects, and my music to make my own music videos.

You can check out Pablo the Mad Tiger Warrior music videos at https://www.youtube.com/@pablothemadtigerwarrior

Window Movie Maker is great in that I can do some video editing, but it doesn't come with advanced features.

I'm so jealous that the younger generation can learn more advanced editing techniques at school.  

And also editing takes a lot of time.

It doesn't take long to record a video speech. That's the easy part. 

But the editing and uploading take up a lot of time, which is why I don't post on YouTube as much as I would like. 

Also, I like blogging better because writing is my strength, whereas speaking is more of a weakness due to a speech impediment. 

But I recognize more people would rather watch a video than read a blog.

I have friends who talked about my YouTube videos but not my blog.

I also remember when I worked as a substitute teacher, I had students come up to tell me they watched my YouTube video speeches.

I'm glad that my videos had an impact.

And I will write blogs and make videos until I'm physically unable to do so. 

========
BONUS:

My 1-decade anniversary video on YouTube


"My 1-Decade anniversary on YouTube"



Friday, October 27, 2023

Silence & Violence

 Many activists on social media (and elsewhere) shout the phrase "Silence is Violence"

That statement implies that you're either with us or with the bad guys.  That being neutral gives aid & comfort to their enemies.

To those activists, violence isn't just bombs, bullets, kicks & punches. To them, violence is also any disagreement with them, any inconvenience to them, anything that gets in their way to victory.

They claim that the use of hurtful words is psychological warfare.

But the phrase "Silence is Violence" is a form of psychological warfare


Here's a perfect tweet on this from 2022

https://twitter.com/Louis_Allday/status/1573013966107906048

The way Twitter makes people feel compelled constantly to comment publicly about situations/issues they know little or *nothing* about is very damaging. As is the degradation of the basic understanding that some discussions are appropriate for public consumption & others aren’t.

And that's the thing. It's unrealistic to expect everyone to be ready to go public on your side on every issue.

Don't get me wrong, I would LOVE to have more people fighting on my side. 

I mean, there's a reason I blog and make YouTube speeches. To get more people on my side. 


But not everyone who is silent is doing it out of malice. 

Some of the silence is due to things like

  • being too busy to survive (or helping their family to survive) to be paying attention to all that's going on in this world
  • Not enough time or mental energy to research the issues that are out there
  • Not having the mental capacity to understand all the issues
  • Some people are just very introverted. Public attention has the same harmful effect on them just like how peanuts & bee stings have harmful effects on those with allergies
  • Some people have difficulty expressing themselves
  • Some people are afraid to lose their job and are one missed paycheck (or direct deposit) away from becoming homeless.
Not everyone has the privilege to be publicly vocal about things.

Also, many issues have TONS of nuances that don't fit a 280-character-limit 

And not everyone has the time and mental energy to explain the many nuances of the issues.

And to many activists, they consider the word "nuance" as fighting words. How dare you mention that things aren't as simple as a phrase that can fit within a 280-character limit.

For one example, there's the Israel-Palestine conflict.

New York Times writer Elizabeth Spiers had strangers on social media DEMANDING HER to make a public statement about the latest Israel-Palestine crisis. 

Nevermind that she never lived there, and has other things in her life that also demand her full attention.

But she has written a very classic response to those idiot activists who say stupid phrases like "Silence is Violence".

The article title? "I Don’t Have to Post About My Outrage. Neither Do You."

Elizabeth Spiers, “I Don’t Have to Post about My Outrage. Neither Do You.,” The New York Times, October 17, 2023,

Here are some excerpts from that article

But not everyone was taking a side. As I scrolled through my timeline, I saw lots of random citizens being told that if they didn’t speak out, they, too, would have blood on their hands.

People speaking from both the right and the left seemed to attribute my silence to depraved indifference to human suffering, though they were divided on which humans were suffering. As it happens, I had been dealing with shingles (zero stars, do not recommend) and the depression I struggle with periodically. I was tired and overwhelmed, as are a great many other people. But the voices yelling at me and anyone else who failed to post seemed to believe that not making a statement was itself a statement — and an immoral one, at that.


and the reason more don't take a public stance on Israel-Palestine

There’s a facile version of taking a stand on social media that generates righteous back patting but reduces complex issues to a simple yes or no. Taking simplistic stands can also lead to twisting words. Concern for Palestinians is portrayed as support for Hamas or hatred toward Israel or Jews in general. Anger about Hamas’s deadly attacks on Israeli citizens — or any mention of antisemitism — is portrayed as denigrating the dignity of all Palestinian lives. This kind of thinking is deeply unserious and further fuels hostilities, warping nuanced positions into extremism and mistaking tweet-length expressions of outrage for brave action in the face of atrocity.

 

and this 

Sitting with uncertainty is hard, especially when social media has primed us to expect perfect real-time information during traumatic events and to want instantaneous answers and resolution. Moral certainty is an anchor we cling to when factual certainty is not possible. And the faster we express it, the more certain we appear. The most righteous among us post — and do it immediately.


Totally agree with that part.  In most incidents, the facts of the case aren't made public within the first 48 hours. In many cases, even 48 days later, there are still facts not yet made public. There are things to investigate and verify before officials make official statements. But conspiracy theorists don't even have to wait 48 seconds before they spread half-truths and non-truths on social media. 

That's why I tend to restrain my commenting on very recent incidents. I prefer to wait until the facts come out. It's also why  I usually wait before I blog on the topic.  

 

Now, the following paragraph is more classic than classic. It should be studied by future generations in high school & college courses. It's that important


 

Knee-jerk social media posts are not what bother me most, though. Instead, it’s the idea that not posting is wrong somehow — that everyone needs to speak, all the time. It discourages shutting up and listening and letting the voices that matter the most be heard over the din. It implies it’s not OK to have any uncertainty about what’s going on or any kind of moral analysis that does not lend itself to presentation in a social media post. It does not leave time or space for people to process traumatic events in the sanctuary of their own minds or to gather more information before pronouncing a judgment. It pressures people who don’t have an opinion yet or are working out what they think to manufacture one and present it to a jury of total strangers on the internet who will render an instant verdict on its propriety. 

Yes, Yes, Yes to ALL THAT!

People need to be allowed time & space to process traumatic events.

The "Silence is Violence" fanatics refuse to allow people time & space to process traumatic events.

In other words, the "Silence is Violence" crowd commit extreme psychological violence against those who need time & space to process traumatic events. 

This reminds me of back in 2020/2021 when idiot activists got mad at Chloe Kim (Olympic snowboarder) for not being fast enough to make a public statement against anti-Asian racism when it turned out that she was dealing with her own trauma of anti-Asian racism.

Alyssa Roenigk, “Olympic Gold Medalist Chloe Kim Shares Her Experiences with Anti-Asian Hate,” ESPN, April 2, 2021, 

In an interview with ESPN on Thursday night, Kim opened up about her experience of racism, her fears for her safety and that of her parents, and her decision to speak out as a high-profile Asian American woman.

"I was getting messages from people telling me I'm part of the problem because I was being silent," Kim told ESPN. "I was like, 'Do you realize I'm also Asian American and this affects me?' It was a lot of white people telling me they were upset at my silence."

Kim said she hoped her Instagram post raised awareness about the prevalence of Asian American hate and illustrated that she, too, deals with discrimination on a daily basis. Her silence was not due to apathy, she said, but fear. "Just because I am a professional athlete or won the Olympics doesn't exempt me from racism," Kim said. "I get hundreds of those kinds of messages monthly. I see maybe 30 a day."

 Also note that Chloe Kim became famous because she was a teen athletic prodigy, when most people her age haven't even developed a political or sociological philosophy, much less know how to express it.  You can't expect teen prodigies (whether in sports, arts, etc)  to be articulate on social issues like how Malcolm X or Martin Luther King were in their 30's. 

This is especially because teen prodigies are still in their teens and therefore still learning how to deal with socio-emotional issues that affect them. Most adults aren't good at expressing how they deal with socio-emotional issues, but people were mad at a then-teenager for not knowing how to express her grief of dealing with anti-Asian racism? 

While people were expecting a then-teenaged Chloe Kim to speak like Malcolm X, we have to remember that the real-life Malcolm X wasn't an activist as a teen. As a teen & young adult, he was a street hustler.   He started to become more educated in sociology and politics while incarcerated. In other words, some people need a little more time to mature before they become ready for prime time

But people demanded a then-teenaged Chloe Kim to have Malcolm X level of articulateness on social issues, when Malcolm X didn't become THE Malcolm X until later in life?

Also, people need time to investigate the issue before making public statements. Not everyone is versed on the nuances of Israel-Palestine, climate change, criminal justice, economics, or whatever else is the hot topic of the day.

So to all you idiot activists, lay off with the "Silence is Violence" Nonsense, and learn how to communicate your ideas to those who aren't publicly on your side.

Learn how to convince people. 

Learn how to convince people to join your side.

Learn to lead by example, instead of acting so self-righteous all the time.  
(and this "silence is violence" preaching is the epitome of self-righteous)



Is it easier said than done? Of course. 

But now that you know that "Silence is Violence" isn't effective in gaining sincere support, it's time to learn to talk to the people, instead of always talking at the people


=====
Also check out this 4-minute video from the New York Times, titled "Pick a Side. Pick a Side. Pick a Side. Now."

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/25/opinion/israel-palestine-social-media.html