Wednesday, May 06, 2020

thoughts on the coronavirus crisis (part 5)

For my previous posts on the coronavirus crisis

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/03/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/04/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-2.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/04/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-3.html 

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/05/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-4.html 





image by Alissa Eckert, MS, Dan Higgins, MAMS,


1.) Grieving of Lost Opportunities


Nearly every high schooler looks forward to the final quarter of their senior year!  For some, it is the last time together on their sports teams or other student organizations.  For many, it is Prom Season. And of course, graduation!

Sadly, all of that would be canceled for the Class of 2020!

Everything they looked forward to is gone!

One of my Facebook friends thinks that this new generation of graduates should just get over it and move on. 
 
IT IS NOT THAT SIMPLE! 


For every setback, there are stages of grief!  There is denial, sadness, anger, and eventually acceptance! 

The road to acceptance TAKES A LOT OF TIME! It doesn't happen overnight! 

In fact, telling people "get over it and move on"  PROLONGS THE GRIEVING PROCESS! 

That may sound counter-intuitive, but LIFE IS COUNTER-INTUITIVE!

Let the kids grieve and leave them alone! 

======

Grieving over lost opportunities isn't limited by age.


South by Southwest, a popular festival in Austin that showcases many emerging artists, filmmakers, and musicians was canceled early in the coronavirus.

This video shows interviews with independent filmmakers who were so excited that their films will debut at the festival until it was canceled.  The interviews discussed their grieving process post-cancellation. 

The Atlantic “What Filmmakers Lost When SXSW Was Cancelled”. YouTube video,  Posted Apr 28, 2020





2.) Elections under the coronavirus crisis


In the 2nd part of the coronavirus crisis blog series, I did mention about this crisis leading to more demands for all-mail voting. I also did mention the flaws of such a system.

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/04/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-2.html


I did remember this opinion article by Hawaii's Lee Cataluna published in February (before the virus hit our shores) mentioning the same flaws of an all-mail voting system

Lee Cataluna, “New Election Means Being Vigilant for Old Tricks,” Honolulu Star-Advertiser, February 26, 2020,
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/02/26/hawaii-news/lee-cataluna/lee-cataluna-new-election-means-being-vigilant-for-old-tricks/ 

The possible downside is depressing to consider, though, and it goes something like this:

>> “I’m in charge in this family, and I’ll fill out all the ballots in this house!”

>> “You want to keep your job, you show me your ballot with the right names checked on it.”

>> “This nice politician came to the day room this morning and helped all the kupuna fill out their ballots and took them to be mailed. Isn’t that sweet?”

>> “Hey, man, I hear there’s a guy who is paying 30 bucks for every blank ballot you get for him.”

>> “Voters in one district are complaining that no ballots were delivered to their mailing addresses. In other news, neighbors have reported a suspicious vehicle that showed up on their street moments after the postal delivery.”

>> “Oh, babes, sorry. I filled out yours when I filled out mines. And then I filled out mines. I figure save you the trouble, yeah?”


But we can't conduct an in-person election during an epidemic, can't we?

There was controversy over how primary elections were conducted in Wisconsin last month.  It was past the deadline to apply for absentee voting, some polling places did close and therefore causing long lines in the polling places that were open. 

But we can learn from how Liberia conducted elections in 2014 when the Ebola virus was going around.


Photo by: REUTERS / James Giahyue
Bystanders read the headlines illustrating the battle over holding the election amid the Ebola crisis in Monrovia, Liberia. 



Anthony Banbury, “Elections and Covid-19 — What We Learned from Ebola,” Devex, April 8, 2020
https://www.devex.com/news/opinion-elections-and-covid-19-what-we-learned-from-ebola-96903#

First, elections are possible in dangerous public health conditions if election officials cooperate with health, security, and other key authorities. Second, elections are imperative to protect democratic rights at a time when significant state power is being concentrated in the executive branch through the exercise of powerful emergency measures. And finally, elections must be preserved in times of crisis, as they anchor public trust in national institutions and hold public officials accountable.

Elections are possible even in the direst of public health environments. At the height of the Ebola epidemic in Liberia, the International Foundation for Electoral Systems worked with the National Elections Commission and medical experts to integrate a range of practical health measures, such as social distancing and revised processing, to ensure the safe exchange of ballot papers, ID cards, pens, and other common voting materials. During poll worker training, we incorporated an unprecedented focus on the role of queue controllers and testing the temperatures of voters. And we supported an aggressive voter education effort — built upon an extensive public health campaign — which proved critical to changing citizens’ behavior.
As a result of these measures, the election proceeded without disruption or significant public health consequences. Liberia’s democracy, at a critical stage in its evolution, was able to take a step forward rather than be beaten back by the threats presented by Ebola.
At a time of national crisis, elections are essential because they reinforce democratic institutions and the rule of law. Their postponement can have significant implications for democracy, power, and governance, especially when governments are authorized to use exceptional authorities. Mishandling or manipulating elections during such a crisis can drive the long-term decay of fundamental freedoms, solidify state capture, and feed corruption. As James Madison, the architect of the U.S. Constitution, wrote, "Where … elections end, tyranny begins.''


If Liberia can do this, so can the United States. We have a big election coming up this November! It's time election officials to properly prepare so that in-person voting can go smoothly without too many problems.



3.) Race Relations


 The spread of the virus hasn't been equally distributed among racial groups. 

In the beginning of the coronavirus crisis, there have been rumors that African-Americans would have a stronger immunity to the disease. Sadly, it turned out that African-Americans would have higher rates of infections.  Some of it has to do with higher rates of poverty, as well as higher percentages working in service sector jobs in which "work from home" is nearly impossible. 

Learn more at 
Charles Blow, “Social Distancing Is a Privilege,” New York Times, April 5, 2020,
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/opinion/coronavirus-social-distancing.html


U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams and CNN commentator  Van Jones, both of whom are African-Americans, have also encouraged other African-Americans to practice more healthy habits (eat healthy foods, exercise more, avoid drugs, alcohol & smoking). 


For saying this, both have been accused of "blaming the victims of a racist society". 

U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams

Public Domain
Van Jones


The Van Jones article
Van Jones, “I'm Someone Covid-19 Could Easily kill. Here Is What I'm Doing About It,” CNN, April 24, 2020,
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/24/opinions/creating-a-pandemic-resistant-black-community-jones/index.html



the responses to Van Jones' article
Royce Dunmore, “Van Jones Slammed for Saying Black People Must Change ‘lifestyle Choices’ Amid Coronavirus Pandemic,” NewsOne, April 24, 2020,
https://newsone.com/playlist/van-jones-slammed-black-people-change-lifestyle-choices-amid-coronavirus/item/10/



Van Jones has long been an advocate of social justice. He is dedicated to educating others about how the effects of racism are still hurting the African-American community.  But because he also mentions that sometimes people have unhealthy habits that make them more vulnerable to illnesses, he gets accused of "blaming the victim" and "ignoring the harms of a racist society"?

This is ridiculous.

We can multi-task! We can be aggressive against racism AND promote healthier habits.

I mean, Michelle Obama has been doing both of that for years. She wrote about how felt she felt socially isolated while being an African-American student at Princeton University. She introduced Barack Obama to community organizers in Chicago's Southside.  She also advocated for healthier meals at school cafeterias. 


U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams also addressed the Latino community in his comments, being that he does have Latino relatives. Yet PBS reporter Yamiche Alcindor abused the race card in her tweets while Adams' speech was still going on.

Townhall writer Julio Rosas had a classic response to all this

Julio Rosas, “PBS' White House Reporter Irresponsibly Tries to Gin up Racial Controversy Against Us Surgeon General,” Townhall, April 13, 2020,
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2020/04/13/pbs-white-house-reporter-irresponsibly-tries-to-gin-up-racial-controversy-against-surgeon-general-n2566799

As a Latino myself, I did not find the appeal to be problematic at all because I know of the unhealthy habits that are common within the Hispanic community. Likewise, Adams knows how devastating COVID-19 can be to people with underlying conditions or whose bodies are not in the best of shape because of unhealthy habits, which in turn can be harder for their immune system to fight off the virus.

As for myself, even I have to remind myself to get off the computer, take a walk or ride a bike. And also to reduce my junk food intake and eat more fruits and veggies. This isn't "blame the victim", it's about self-improvement. 


========

In other race relations news, there has long been a stigma towards face coverings that comes with stereotypes regarding criminal activity. 

But now people of all races are encouraged to wear face coverings.

But the previous stigma doesn't go away overnight.

Dr. Oz was using a red bandana to demonstrate how to properly cover your mouth & nose.

screenshot via Jing
Dr. Oz holding a red bandana

The problem is, the red bandana is associated with the Bloods gang.  Wearing that could get you killed by rival gangs or harassed by the police who would just assume you are a gang member.


Aaron Thomas responded to suggestions to wear face coverings in an article that went viral.

Aaron Thomas, “Why I Don’t Feel Safe Wearing a Face Mask,” The Boston Globe, April 5, 2020,
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/05/opinion/why-i-dont-feel-safe-wearing-face-mask/

On Saturday I thought about the errands I need to make this week, including a trip to the grocery store. I thought I could use one of my old bandanas as a mask. But then my voice of self-protection reminded me that I, a Black man, cannot walk into a store with a bandana covering the greater part of my face if I also expect to walk out of that store. The situation isn’t safe and could lead to unintended attention, and ultimately a life-or-death situation for me. For me, the fear of being mistaken for an armed robber or assailant is greater than the fear of contracting COVID-19
These are the fears that Black Americans have to constantly face. Where we can go, how we can show up, what we can wear, what we can say — it never ends. The world is upside down right now with the coronavirus pandemic, and we are living in a dystopian nightmare come to life. Still, we are living in an America where history dictates that, even in the most absurd times, hatred and bigotry continue to reign. We are still judged, convicted, and sentenced by race, by gender, sexual orientation, and class.
and more

I will not be covering my face until I am able to obtain a face mask that is unmistakable for what it is. Let me be clear: This is not because I do not trust the advice of the CDC — I do. I believe in science, and I have followed all of its guidelines up to this point. I know masks work, and I trust the CDC’s recommendation.
What I do not trust are the innate biases and lack of critical thought about the implications of these decisions. I do not trust that I can walk into a grocery store with my face covered and not be disturbed. I do not trust that I will not be followed. I do not trust that I will be allowed to exist in my Black skin and be able to buy groceries or other necessities without a confrontation and having to explain my intent and my presence. I do not trust that wearing a make-shift mask will allow me to make it back to my home.



The issue was commented further on this article
Annie Reneau, “A Black Man's Viral Commentary On Face Masks Shows Why It's Not an Easy Choice for Everyone,” Upworthy, April 6, 2020,
https://www.upworthy.com/black-man-wearing-face-masks-coronavirus



4.)  Education


As mentioned in previous posts on the coronavirus crisis, many critics of traditional schools were gloating that this era of mandated distance learning would be the beginning of the end of traditional schools. 

But in reality, this mandated distance learning is making many people MORE appreciative of traditional schools.

It is a major source of stress for families to be doing teleconferences for work, while also homeschooling their multiple children.  

Elizabeth A. Harris, “'It Was Just Too Much': How Remote Learning Is Breaking Parents,” Yahoo, April 28, 2020




With teachers relegated to computer screens, parents have to play teacher’s aide, hall monitor, counselor and cafeteria worker — all while trying to do their own jobs under extraordinary circumstances. Essential workers are in perhaps the toughest spot, especially if they are away from home during school hours, leaving just one parent, or no one at all, at home when students need them most.
Kindergartners need help logging into Zoom. Seventh graders need help with algebra, last used by Dad circa 1992. “School” often ends by lunchtime, leaving parents from Long Island to Dallas to Los Angeles asking themselves the same question: How bad am I if my child plays “Fortnite” for the next eight hours?

and more

Other families have reached out to McIntyre to say that they are too overwhelmed with their own work to help with the lessons at home. And some have told her they are trying but that their children won’t cooperate.

“She gets frustrated every time we start,” one mother emailed her last week, “and then I get irritated and she gets irritated and it usually ends in me saying we should take a break and then the cycle repeats. One or both of us typically ends up in tears by the time it’s all said and done and no work is completed.”

Even parents who describe running tight ships at home say they are anxious about what months away from classrooms will mean for their children. They are also finding it hard to accept that 25-minute Zoom classes or lessons sent by email is what school has been reduced to.
The litmus tweet of the moment came from Sarah Parcak, an archaeologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

“I told our son’s (lovely, kind, caring) teacher that, no, we will not be participating in her ‘virtual classroom,’ and that he was done with the 1st grade,” she wrote on Twitter in early April. “We cannot cope with this insanity. Survival and protecting his well being come first.”

Yes,  schools with traditional campuses could definitely improve, especially when it comes to protecting student's well-being! 

However, there are also necessary for that not every family is psychologically or economically equipped to do homeschooling. 

========

On the other end of the educational spectrum, the coronavirus crisis is creating more fear for college students pursuing a PhD. 

Many have already taken out student loans, and with this economic climate, there would be fewer opportunities to become faculty members on college campuses.

This article by L. Maren Wood encourages current PhD students to start working on Plan B!

L. Maren Wood, “For Would-Be Academics, Now Is the Time to Get Serious About Plan B,” Chronicle Vitae, April 21, 2020,
https://chroniclevitae.com/news/2341-for-would-be-academics-now-is-the-time-to-get-serious-about-plan-b



A lot of graduate students and recent Ph.D.s are in a dire state of limbo now that Covid-19 has brought faculty hiring to a screeching halt. I know how it feels to be a job candidate with spectacularly bad timing through no fault of your own. After all, I earned my doctorate in 2009 — a year after the faculty job market collapsed in the Great Recession of 2008.
Back then I spent three fruitless years on a tenure-track market with very few openings and far too many applicants. So let me offer would-be faculty members some advice that I wish someone had told me early on: Academe may be your Plan A, but this is no time to hold off on creating and pursuing a Plan B
and

 But isn’t leaving academe tantamount to selling out? No, it’s survival. If your advisers or fellow students are disappointed in your decision, then they truly do not understand the depth of the hiring crisis, nor the toll that contingent positions take on people’s lives and health. Their disappointment should be at a system that churns out Ph.D.s with nowhere for them to go, and with little preparation for other kinds of meaningful careers.

I definitely second the necessity of a Plan B!  While I'm currently in a full-time library job, it took YEARS to land one.  If I only focused only on Plan A, I would've been living on the streets while I was waiting to land a full-time library job.

Ignore the idiots who say "focus only on a Plan A"!  Always have a Plan B, as well as a Plan C and a Plan D. 

Tuesday, May 05, 2020

thoughts on the coronavirus crisis (part 4)

For my previous posts on the coronavirus crisis

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/03/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/04/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-2.html

https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2020/04/thoughts-on-coronavirus-crisis-part-3.html 




1.) My life under the coronavirus crisis lockdown


In my previous posts on the coronavirus crisis, I mentioned about being a school library employee being locked out from the campus but still getting paid. I also mentioned my school has weekday morning teleconferences to keep us updated.

I also mentioned about the Unemployment Insurance office being overwhelmed and trying to get state workers from other departments to help out.

Since the previous post, I did apply to help out. At the time, they were looking at morning & afternoon shifts. I initially applied for the afternoon shifts being that I have morning teleconferences with my school. However, they changed it to everyone working one shift from morning to afternoon. Therefore, a scheduling conflict for me. 

I also noted to them I can do data entry, data verification, and email/chat interactions (if available) but no call center work. But the bulk of the open positions are for call center work.  Sorry, but I need to save my sanity. 


=====

Last week, I have been able to vacuum and wipe the floor of my studio apartment. The Favor Squirt & Mop floor cleaner is wonderful for cleaning the floor. 


SC Johnson
Favor Squirt & Mop


However, the yellowed tiles (meaning the tiles weren't supposed to be yellow, it got that way over time) were a different challenge. These tiles tend to be in areas that rarely receive sunlight or fresh air (for example, under my storage tubs, under my mattress). I previously tried remedies suggested online like using baking soda & vinegar. Didn't work

This time I used laundry bleach. It worked. The challenge with that method is that while the bleach worked its magic, I stayed outside on the lanai (balcony) due to the strong smell of the bleach. Every so often I come back in, wipe the bleached area, notice some of the yellow stains have faded, then add more bleach on the areas that still need more fade. Then I went back outside for fresh air. I did this several times over a circa 2 hour period. By the end, the yellow on the tiles has faded so much that you wouldn't have known it existed a few hours earlier.


Also on the homefront

  • I rearranged my storage bins & tubs for more consistency
  • got new curtains for better privacy protection
  • replaced my battery-powered radio.  The previous one stopped working, and I would like to have one so I can listen to the news during stormy weather or other situations involving power outages

======

For outside exercise, I usually take walks, though if time & weather permits, I'm on my bike. 

On April 25, when the mayor reopened public parks for individual exercises (group gatherings and team sports still not allowed), I rode through Ala Moana Beach Park. There were so many people on the pathways, it was like pets all being released from the cage all at once. 

Last Saturday night, I rode my bike all the way from home (circa UHM) all the way to Kalihi, and back home.  Fun times. 



2.) Hawaii still not ready to reopen so fast


In the continental US, there have been massive protests to reopen places and end the coronavirus lockdowns.

In Hawaii, only a small fringe take part.

There's a historical reason for that.

For thousands of years, Hawaii has been isolated from the outside world and therefore not exposed to the diseases that the Europeans, Africans, and Asians have long developed immunity to.  When the Europeans came in the late 1700's,  the Native Hawaiians were exposed to diseases their bodies had no immunity to. Thousands have died to influenza, measles and other diseases for which we now have vaccines for. It didn't take a massacre for the Native Hawaiians to be eventually outnumbered in their own homeland, all it took was outside diseases to wipe out a large number of them. It was only after 1900 when the bulk of the Native Hawaiians finally developed immunity to such diseases that their numbers finally start to increase again. 


learn more at
Doug Herman, “Shutting Down Hawai‘i: A Historical Perspective On Epidemics in the Islands,” Smithsonian Magazine, March 25, 2020,

With that history, the people of Hawaii were quick to demand lockdown when the first cases of coronavirus came in early March. People were angry that the government didn't act fast enough to shut everything down. 

Being that Hawaii is the midway point between North America & Asia, it was expected that Hawaii would become a major breeding point for the virus. But because of the lockdown, the disease didn't spread as much as expected. 

Parks were recently reopened for individual exercise under the recommendation of health experts.

There have been talks of slowly allowing certain businesses to re-open.

This reopening will only happen gradually and could be scaled back if cases increase again. 

However, tourism will still be highly regulated. There is talk of placing ankle monitors on tourists to make sure they are in 14-day quarantine when they arrive. There is concern that this is police state tactics, but it does have the support of the residents here. They don't want so many tourists coming all at once soon, being that there are worries they will bring a second wave of coronavirus. 


on the  ankle monitor proposal
Chad Blair, “Nothing Screams ‘aloha’ Like an Ankle Monitor,” Honolulu Civil Beat, May 2, 2020, 


Christina Jedra, “COVID-19 Monitoring Could Turn Hawaii Into a Tourist ‘prison Camp,’ Critics Say,” Honolulu Civil Beat, April 29, 2020,


It might be months, even years before big events would reopen again. That would be the last thing to reopen. 

3.) More localized governance is better


It is commonly said, "why can't a big country like  the USA  be so quick to stop the virus (or do anything else, fill in the blank)?"


But the reason the USA federal government can't act so quickly is because it is so big!

The larger the landmass to control, the longer it takes to take control of anything.

Smaller countries like Singapore and South Korea were quick to contain the virus BECAUSE they are smaller. They have less landmass and fewer people to control. 

Meanwhile, big countries like China, Russia, and the USA move much slower to contain the virus. They're just too big!

Hawaii was able to slow the spread of the virus because it has a smaller but dense landmass.  This even though people complain the governor didn't act fast enough. 

In the continental US, a cluster of neighboring states was able to come together to coordinate lockdown and gradual reopenings based on the conditions on the ground. 

Daily Kos (a left-wing website known for clickbait titles) have noted that these coalitions of states (for example, West Coast states,  Northeastern states) could effectively function if they were their own little united states. We could have an independent nation of the Westside, New England,  Mid-Atlantic, and so forth! However, this comes with a fear of a rebirth of a southern confederacy.

Anyways, here's the Daily Kos article
Kos, “Trump Declares Himself a dictator. Blue-State Governors organize. A Breakup Is Now On the Table,” Daily Kos, April 14, 2020,



4.) China, Taiwan and WHO


China's initial response to the coronavirus crisis is to deny it and censor anyone who goes public about it. 

Taiwan's response is to go public about the situation and encouraged people to wear masks when going outside.

If you are in charge of a world health organization, whose example would you follow?

Sadly, the real-life World Health Organization (WHO) ignored Taiwan's example because the Chinese communist government still can't get over the fact that Taiwan is an independent nation not under its control. 

If an ex doesn't want to be with you for the last 61 months, you should be over that already (or at least acknowledge you'll never be together again). But this is 61 YEARS since Taiwan was outside China's control, China should just get over it and move on.

The people running WHO are moral cowards! They should stand up and acknowledge publicly that Taiwan is an independent nation. But in press conferences, when questioned about Taiwan's virus management, the WHO's epidemiologist Bruce Aylward acted as if he didn't understand the question. No, Aylward understood the question, just like we understand that Aylward is a coward that can't speak truth to power.  


Learn more at
ReasonTV. “How China Corrupted the World Health Organization's Response to COVID-19”.  YouTube video,  Posted April 15, 2020




5.)  Rent freezes


I believe that landlords should be flexible and not be so rigid when dealing with tenants who can no longer pay their usual amount. 

If I was a landlord and I was charging (for example) $900 a month, but the tenant can only pay $200 this month, I'll just take the $200, and delay whatever projects I was hoping to pay for.

However, I'm not in favor of freezing rents for everyone. Those who can pay the usual amount should do so. I'm currently getting paid the usual month so I am paying my rent this month. 

Apartment maintenance isn't free.  Landlords stay have to pay property taxes, maintenance staff, electricity for the common areas, and repairs. That stuff isn't free. 

Learn more at 
Poppy Noor, “Landlords On the Pandemic: 'everyone Has an Impression of Us as Rich and Greedy',” The Guardian, April 20, 2020,


However, there is one shady practice that should be condemned

Some landlords have been using their tenant's social security number to check the IRS website to see if their tenant received the $1200 stimulus. This is a privacy violation

Learn more at 
Mark Pygas, “Property Manager Allegedly Used Tenant's Ssn to Track Stimulus Payment and Demand Rent,” Upworthy, April 2020,


6.)  The coronavirus crisis affecting rats too


As people's habits have changed during the coronavirus lockdown, so do the animals who depend on human habits.

Rats who have long lived near restaurants had to find new sources of food. They migrated to new territories where they fought with rats that were already there over resources. 

Areas near homes where they'll be more food disposed because everyone is now at home will get an increase of rats coming their way.

This rat migration could also affect homeless humans living on the streets.

Learn more at
Dartunorro Clark, “Starving, Angry and Cannibalistic: America's Rats Are Getting Desperate Amid Coronavirus Pandemic,” Yahoo, April 13, 2020,


7.) A famous name can hurt your chance of getting unemployment compensation

Most of us know of a Tupac Shakur who was a rapper/actor who passed away in Las Vegas in 1996.

While his spirit lives on, there is another Tupac Shakur still alive in Kentucky.

But instead of making records & films, this Tupac Shakur (who usually goes by the name Malik) is a cook working at two restaurants.  Or was a cook, until both restaurants shut down due to the coronavirus crisis.

So Malik filed for unemployment compensation. However, the people working in the unemployment office saw that name and thought it was a prank. 

Kentucky governor Andy Beshear found out about this and used this case as an example of how frauds and pranks have delayed the processing of unemployment claims.

Turns out that Tupac Shakur was for real and he was wondering why his unemployment checks didn't come in.

When Governor Beshear found out the truth, he apologized and promised this Tupac Shakur he would get his unemployment compensation.  Shakur said he forgives Beshear for his errors. 

Learn more at 
WTVQ News Desk, “No Joke: Tupac Shakur Needs Unemployment Benefit,” WTVQ, April 28, 2020,

Lauren Floyd, “Kentucky Governor Apologizes for His Response When Tupac Shakur Filed for Unemployment,” Daily Kos, April 29, 2020




Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Democrat primary

There was much promise in the diversity among the candidates who planned to run for the Democrat nomination for president!

We  had


  • Joe Biden (former VP under Obama)
  • Bernie Sanders (the loud socialist who ran a surprising campaign in 2016)
  • Elizabeth Warren (senator, consumer advocate, professor)
  • Cory Booker (former Newark mayor, now New Jersey senator)
  • Kamala Harris (California senator, former state attorney general)
  • Julian Castro (Obama's housing director)
  • Andrew Yang (tech entrepreneur)
  • Tulsi Gabbard (eccentric representative from Hawaii)
  • Mike Bloomberg (billionaire, ex-mayor of New York)
  • Amy Klobuchar (senator from Minnesota)
  • Pete Buttigieg (mayor of South Bend, Indiana)
  • Tom Steyer (billionaire)

I once predicted Cory Booker to be the best bet for the nomination.  My thinking is that the voters preferred a tough guy (which was Donald Trump's appeal) and Cory Booker was the one guy who could make Trump look weak. My thinking was also based on the fact that the number of African-Americans who voted went down in 2016 since Obama was no longer on the ballot, and that Booker might bring them back to the polls for 2020. I also thought that would be important to bring the industrial Midwest states (ie Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) back to the Democrat column.

However, much of the energy Cory Booker could've brought was deflated when Kamala Harris entered the race. She got more intersectional points by being both "black" (she has Jamaican & Indian parents) and female.  However, when people found out that Kamala Harris advocated for punitive marijuana policies, sent parents to jail for their children's truancy,  and doubled-down even when her convictions were proven to be under false premises, this went against the trend towards a less punitive criminal justice policy favored by the Left.

learn more at

Jamilah King, “Kamala harris made history. Then her history caught up with her.,” Mother Jones, December 3, 2019, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/12/kamala-harris-made-history-then-her-history-caught-up-with-her/

Lara Bazelon, “Kamala Harris Was Not a ‘Progressive Prosecutor’,” New York Times, January 17, 2019,
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/17/opinion/kamala-harris-criminal-justice.html


Kamala Harris did get a boost when she questioned Joe Biden about his anti-busing stance in the 1970s and said: "that little girl was me".  This gave the impression that Biden was somehow a segregationist, and that it hurts inner city  "little girls like me". But it turned out that even many African-Americans objected to mandatory busing, and that Harris would've had access to a great education even without busing being that her parents were university professors. 

Her attempts to show that Joe Biden wasn't "woke enough" BACKFIRED BIG TIME!  Kamala Harris couldn't even garner enough African-American support, and Joe Biden won the majority of African-American voters.  "Woker than thou" really doesn't win over African-American voters outside of the radical fringe.


Jeff Jacoby on Joe Biden's opinion on mandatory busing actually matched the overall African-American opinion
Jeff Jacoby, “Biden was right. Busing was wrong.,” Townhall, July 3, 2019,
https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffjacoby/2019/07/03/biden-was-right-busing-was-wrong-n2549504

----------- On the baloney assertion that Kamala Harris was some underprivileged "that little girl was me" when she actually had a privileged upbringing in Berkeley (NOT Selma)
Daniel Greenfield, “Kamala Harris Lives in One of the Most Segregated Neighborhoods in Los Angeles,” Front Page Mag, July 18, 2019,
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/07/kamala-harris-lives-one-most-segregated-daniel-greenfield/



Julian Castro had a memorable line back in the 2012 Democrat convention when he mocked Mitt Romney for stating that young wannabe entrepreneurs should borrow money from their parents. Castro sarcastically responded "why didn't I think of that" noting that many wannabe entrepreneurs don't have rich parents to borrow money from.  Too bad Castro didn't have an arsenal of similar classic zingers this time around.

Booker, Harris, and Castro were unable to convince enough of "their own people" to support them. In opinion polls, they lagged so much that all 3 dropped out before the first primary. 

on why Cory Booker and Kamala Harris failed to get massive African-American support
Sheriff David Clarke, “Like Kamala Harris, Cory Booker Never Had A Chance,” Townhall, January 14, 2020, https://townhall.com/columnists/sheriffdavidclarkeret/2020/01/14/like-kamala-harris-cory-booker-never-had-a-chance-n2559456


Andrew Yang and Pete Buttigieg were "Johnny Come Lately's" in that they had no name recognition before the campaign.  I think they campaigned this time around just to get a buzz, and then use that as a launching pad for 2024 when they would have more name recognition by then. 

Pete Buttigieg got attention for being an openly gay man with the potential to become the first gay president.  He was the mayor of South Bend, Indiana (the home of Notre Dame University) and therefore the person who could help Democrats win the Midwest. However, police brutality scandals in his city alienated African-American voters.  

Donald Trump taunted Pete Buttigieg for looking like MAD Magazine's mascot Alfred Neuman.  Buttigieg responded by claiming he didn't know about the Alfred Neuman character and said "maybe it's a generational thing".  I didn't fall for that response. I'm about the same age as Buttigieg and damn right I grew up reading MAD Magazine! There's no way in hell Buttigieg wouldn't have known about Alfred Neuman growing up! 

Andrew Yang's  Universal Basic Income (UBI) was ahead of its time.  By the time the coronavirus crisis made UBI appealing to many who have lost their jobs, it was too late for Andrew Yang. But I think he'll be back to promote that issue in 2024. 

Tulsi Gabbard also used this primary to get national name recognition, though I doubt she'll even be a factor in 2024. I think her main goal is to become a TV pundit. This is a similar path taken by Mike Huckabee who got his own show on Fox News after his failed run in 2008. 

Amy Klobuchar got some national attention during the confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh.  She was seen as a feminist hero. She was also a relatively moderate Democrat and therefore could appeal to those alienated by the "woker than thou" Kamala Harris and the socialist Bernie Sanders. 

However, reports have come about Klobuchar's verbally abusive ways towards her employees. She humiliates her workers over even the most minor errors. 

Matt Flegenheimer and Sydney Ember, “How Amy Klobuchar Treats Her Staff,” New York Times, February 22, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/us/politics/amy-klobuchar-staff.html



Some feminists claim that it's sexist to even make minor criticisms about Klobuchar's abusive ways. They engage in "what-about-ism" and point to male bosses who engage in similar behavior. But in real life, people do NOT hesitate to refer to abusive male bosses as "pigs", "a-hole", "jerk", and "a d---" (d-word that rhymes with rick).  But people hesitate to make minor criticisms of female bosses out of fear of being called "sexist", "mansplainers", "can't handle strong women" and other slanders. 

Also, note the worker abuse allegations regarding Amy Klobuchar were basically non-existent regarding Elizabeth Warren. In other words, Klobuchar is being judged on the content of her character. 

I truly believe that if Bernie Sanders didn't run in 2020, Elizabeth Warren would've gotten nearly the entire far-left progressive base and would've been more competitive with  Joe Biden.  Bernie Sanders was just too exciting a competitor for Elizabeth Warren to keep up with. 

I also think Elizabeth Warren's changing narrative about her alleged Native American ancestry also aroused suspicions among voters. Me being a mixed-race people whose parent's DNA test revealed some low percentages of racial ancestries my family didn't identify with, I could identify with Warren's struggle to learn about her identity. However, the general public just wasn't ready to hear it and they believed she emphasized her very low level of Native American ancestry to gain Affirmative Action points when applying for university jobs. 


my blog post on my parent's DNA test
https://pablowegesend.blogspot.com/2017/03/tracing-my-roots.html



articles on why Elizabeth Warren lost the primaries

Katie Herzog, “Sexism didn't kill the Warren campaign. The Warren campaign killed the Warren campaign.,” Reason Magazine, March 6, 2020, https://reason.com/2020/03/06/sexism-didnt-kill-the-warren-campaign-the-warren-campaign-killed-the-warren-campaign/


Timothy Shenk, “Elizabeth Warren Was the Wrong Kind of Radical,” New York Times, March 5, 2020,
----

Mike Bloomberg was supposed to come and "save" the Democrats from the socialists and the "woker than thous."  He had tons of money and was able to out-advertise most of his opponents. It turned out that it was all for nothing.

Bloomberg wasn't trusted by most Democrat supporters. He constantly changes political parties. He was a Democrat, then became a Republican to replace Rudy Giuliani as New York's mayor. He then became independent, and then became a Democrat again to run in the primary.

Bloomberg left the Republican Party due to his anti-gun stance. Yes, he said something about the rich should pay higher taxes, and he said something about climate change, but his main issue for switching was his anti-gun stance. While this issue will make him feel at home with the Democrats, it is also an issue which would've alienated the general public.

However, what really hurt Bloomberg among Democrats was law enforcement policies as New York's mayor. As mayor, Bloomberg continued Giuliani's "stop & frisk" policies that treated African-Americans and Latinos as guilty until proven innocent.  Bloomberg doubled-down on that issue until he made an obviously phony apology YEARS AFTER his time as mayor was over. 

Bloomberg also had some serious sexual harassment allegations, and he protected himself with Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA). In the #metoo era, time's up for that kind of nonsense.

What exactly was the strategy for Bloomberg to run for president? Was it to appeal to the sector of the population that wanted someone who was just slightly less worse than Donald Trump?  Those people would've voted for Trump anyway. 

Bloomberg did prove one thing though. There are limits to the power of money when it comes to elections. 

Eric Boehm, “Losers Bloomberg and Steyer spent millions. Stop freaking out about money in politics.,” Reason Magazine, March 4, 2020, https://reason.com/2020/03/04/losers-bloomberg-and-steyer-spent-millions-stop-freaking-out-about-money-in-politics/



======

And then we had Bernie Sanders.

He came out of nowhere and made the world take notice as he energized a new generation of progressives when he ran against Hillary Clinton in 2016. He promised free college and Medicare for All.  He demanded higher taxes on the rich and more programs for the poor.  He wasn't afraid to call himself a socialist, and a whole new generation that was born after the Cold War was OK with that too!

However, in 2016, he couldn't get enough African-American voters excited for him, whereas Hillary Clinton had an advantage being that her husband was very popular with African-Americans. 

By 2020, the Bernie Sanders revolution had 4 more years to gain momentum. Many young progressives felt that his boldness would be a perfect match against Donald Trump. They don't want business as usual. They thought Joe Biden was the epitome of the failed Democrat establishment, and that it was now their turn to take over the party.

Bernie Sanders did very well in the early primaries. He basically tied with Buttigieg in Iowa and won in New Hampshire and Nevada.

However,  Bernie Sanders's past statements praising Fidel Castro became public.  Sanders had long praised Castro's socialist programs while using weasel words to dismiss Castro's brutality as a dictator.

At times like these, great leaders are put to the test. In his first run for president, Barack Obama was questioned about his church's pastor (Reverend Jeremiah Wright) yelling "God Damn America".  In response, Obama made a legendary speech about where he differed from Rev. Wright while explaining to the public the historical context that Wright's feelings came from. 

As for Bernie Sanders, when questioned about his praise for Fidel Castro, he basically doubled-down! He refused to apologize!

This was the moment from which Bernie Sanders could never recover.

Bernie Sanders could've had his legendary moment had he went to Miami and tearfully apologize for not taking Fidel Castro's brutality seriously.   Too late now! 

Bill Clinton was the master at tearful apologies. He showed vulnerable emotions from a position of strength. It may sound manipulative but it works.

Bernie Sanders refused to do this. 

This issue proved that Bernie Sanders showed a lack of empathy towards the victims of Fidel Castro's regime.

here's an article by a victim of Fidel Castro's indoctrination

Yuri Pérez, “Yes, Bernie Sanders, Castro's literacy program was 'a bad thing.' I was indoctrinated by it.,” NBC News, February 28, 2020,
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/yes-bernie-sanders-castro-s-literacy-program-was-bad-thing-ncna1145001


And here's an article about the gains in literacy in Cuba under Fidel Castro was less impressive than THE GREATER GAINS IN LITERACY in the REST OF LATIN AMERICA during the same time period

Becket Adams, “Stop Praising Castro for Health and Education 'advances',” Washington Examiner, November 28, 2016, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/stop-praising-castro-for-health-and-education-advances.



Everyone predicted this issue would harm Bernie Sanders in Florida where a lot of Cuban refugees live.

It turns out it harmed him everywhere else too.

Look at the results, look at the scoreboard. Bernie Sanders lost nearly every primary after being questioned about the issue.

It wasn't just the Cuban-American community that was offended, it offended nearly everyone else with some human decency! 

Though to be fair, some might've voted against Bernie Sanders mostly out of strategic reasons:  they are so desperate to defeat Donald Trump that they voted against Bernie Sanders because they KNOW this issue will continue to hurt him in the General Election. It's "let's stop Bernie Sanders now because he will cause us to lose Florida".

Those who continue to support Bernie Sanders will insist that he lost the primaries because of the Big Bad Corporate Donors to the DNC. They will insist that the center-left media just favored Biden against Sanders.  

But don't forget this, when Bernie Sanders was tested on an issue that required a show of human empathy, he failed!


=======

And now there is one!

It all comes down to Joe Biden!

He still has a lot of goodwill from being Obama's vice-president.

He has gotten further left this time around, but not too far left to scare the moderates. 

When questioned about socialized-medicine, he correctly pointed out that Italy has that system, but it still was burdened heavily by the coronavirus crisis. 

He might modify Obama's Affordable Care Act, but he won't make it a government monopoly like Sanders wanted.

He will likely make moderate proposals to reduce college debt and increase college financial aid, but won't likely make college free for all. 

The American public really doesn't want radical overhauls, they tend to want moderate improvements. Joe Biden represents that!

 2016 would've been a perfect time to run. He could've defeated Trump. However, the "woker than thou" crowd demanded Hillary Clinton. We know the results of that! 

The American public doesn't want "woker than thou" regardless of how loud & vicious the twitter mobs are.  This primary (plus the Dave Chappelle special) showed how shallow the support for the "woke" SJW pansies are even in the communities they claim to represent. 

Look at the scoreboard, the African-American community still supported Joe Biden even after Kamala Harris humiliated him in the debate.  "Woker than thou" doesn't work! 

Nobody with a working brain could ever think that a person who served as a top assistant to the first black president could be a racist.  So Kamala Harris should've just knocked it off with that nonsense! 

=====

Yes, there are weaknesses in Joe Biden.

He is becoming less clear in expressing his thoughts! This could be trouble when it comes time to debate Donald Trump, a master manipulator. 

There's also the sexual harassment scandal with Tara Reade. She alleged that Biden did to her what Trump bragged about doing in that infamous conversation with Billy Bush. 

Even though Trump is a known sex offender, he was still able to call Bill Clinton out about his past sex offenses in 2016.  What makes anyone think Trump won't do the same in 2020 to Joe Biden? 

Trump has a fan base that will support him no matter what. 

Joe Biden has the challenge of convincing skeptical progressives and moderates that he is up for the job. 

He will also have to find a running mate who will make up for his weaknesses. 

The big question is would that be enough?

Time will tell!